624
ANTI-UNITY STRATEGY (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by chpsnick@lemmy.world to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 94 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I do remember seeing one of their terms saying something along the lines of "similar games will count as one" for the purposes of installs+revenue, that or someone mentioning it. Can't seem to find it anymore, maybe they removed it? EDIT - Found one mention of it, "Games or apps with substantially similar content may be counted as one project", Unity probably went back on this one, as it's not listed on the FAQ right now

Though considering Pokemon Shining Pearl/Brilliant Diamond runs on Unity, I doubt they'd want to let such a high selling game go untaxed.

[-] ackthxbye@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Just goes to show nobody at Unity bothered to think this shit through. With the clause they're going to have so many lawsuits with similar-but-not-same games, without the clause devs can dodge the fees like this.

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
624 points (97.6% liked)

Gaming

19858 readers
62 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS