442

Canadian Sikh Facebook users receive notifications that their posts are being taken down because they’re in violation of Indian law

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So they received a take down request from the Indian government, mistook the users for being in India, followed the law that they're required to follow in India, and when it was brought to their attention that those users were actually based in Canada they went back and allowed the posts. This doesn't seem as malicious as people are making it out to be, they should probably work on their geo-blocking, but with 3 billion users in 150+ countries with their own local laws it's probably safer to be aggressive when it comes to removing content when requested.

[-] blackfire@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I think this comes under the 'Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity' Hanlons razor

[-] bobman@unilem.org 3 points 2 years ago

'Guilty until proven innocent.'

Glad corporations get the power to make these decisions.

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Well they don't, hence why they're taking down posts as required by the countries they operate in and willing to accept a noticable false positive rate to do it.

[-] bobman@unilem.org -4 points 2 years ago

What are you talking about?

What requirement is there in India for Facebook to ban Canadians?

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

and willing to accept a noticable false positive rate to do it.

It'd probably help if you fully read the comments you're replying to lol

[-] bobman@unilem.org -2 points 2 years ago

So... guilty until proven innocent.

Like I said. From the very beginning.

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Your first comment was incredibly vague... I was responding to this part:

Glad corporations get the power to make these decisions.

However, a high false positive rate is different than assuming every post is "guilty until proven innocent", and they aren't mutually exclusive either. Current example here would be the automated removal of CSAM on Lemmy. A model was built to remove CSAM and it has a high rate of false positives. Does this mean that it assumes everything is CSAM until it's able to confirm it isn't? No. It could work that way, that's an implementation detail that I don't know the specifics of, but it doesn't necessarily mean it does.

But really, who cares? The false positive rate matters for site usability for sure, but the rest is an implementation detail in an AI model, it isn't the court of law. Nobody's putting you in Facebook prison because they accidentally mistook your post for rule breaking.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
442 points (98.5% liked)

News

36366 readers
829 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS