553
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BrikoX@vlemmy.net to c/maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Deez@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

Excellent. John would be proud.

[-] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

No, he wouldn't. He would say continuing to visit a site you are protesting against isn't a protest at all.

[-] Max_UL@lemmy.pro 8 points 1 year ago

He’d be all for both, but he certainly likes malicious compliance as protest when feasible.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
553 points (98.8% liked)

Malicious Compliance

20 readers
1 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS