112
submitted 1 year ago by DeadWorld@lemm.ee to c/brainworms@lemm.ee
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] anon_water@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago
[-] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep, my experience is that companies fiddle with the scores and payouts to avoid rewarding people. It’s why wages haven’t gone up much. On top of that, the review process is as annoying and pointless as possible.

[-] DrMango@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I can't even tell you how many time my annual reviews have been some form of "well you exceeded expectations and are one of the top performers on our team, that's why we are giving you a middle rating. Enjoy your COLA raise which is well below the rate of inflation."

[-] 50gp@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

wonder how much money they lose long term by not rewarding good work and building lifetime employees

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I quit my last job over this, which caused them a lot of hardship. I was still getting texts a year later asking how things worked. My ex-coworkers on LinkedIn have messaged me more than once saying nothing gets done or done right since I left.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

The reviews are directly tied to the bonuses, so they have a point and Microsoft has financial motivation to doctor them. It's pretty frustrating that institutions with more money than they'll ever need, still engage in unethical practices to hoard more money. Like, you've made it guys, just be cool. Is it that hard to be cool?

[-] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Standard at IBM 20 years ago

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
112 points (99.1% liked)

BrainWorms

1178 readers
54 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS