92
submitted 2 years ago by C4d@lemmy.world to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 0 points 2 years ago

And it's not reductive to weigh the issue based solely on your circumstances?

There's a weight of evidence to suggest a correlation. There's evidence to the contrary, too, which should also be considered. I just wondered if anybody's factoring it in at all, I certainly haven't heard or read mentioned much in mainstream news.

[-] Arrakis@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I imagine it's not mentioned because of the whole "not all victims are abusers so it's somewhat irrelevant" schtick. You seem to be getting a bit confused, are you white knighting for reason/due process to prevail or not?

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

I wasn't mentioning it in that spirit, certainly not in his defence. I think there's a difference between understanding and condonation that many (to wit, you) fail to appreciate.

Also, I don't think advocating reason and due process should be stigmatised, whatever the motivation.

[-] Arrakis@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Then why were you mentioning it?

No one is stigmatising it, you just seem to be doing a poor job of sticking to it.

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Because I don't think it's common knowledge, it goes some way to explaining (not excusing mind you, before you start salivating) what may or may not have happened. What's more, I don't think people want to know - or want others to know - because it muddies the waters and they just want good vs. bad.

I'm doing a great job sticking to my objectivity, it's just that when all you're surrounded by is half the story, anything contrary to the picture that that paints, looks like complete polar opposition.

[-] Arrakis@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago
[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Oh, we've started with the belittling approach; trying to condescend your way out? How cheap.

[-] Arrakis@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

If you don't want cheap, be deserving of expensive

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Worthy of Clintons. Scratch that, worthy of a wine-obsessed middle-aged woman's Facebook.

[-] Arrakis@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I guess you would know better than most.

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Lol, meaning what? I get a lot of greeting cards? I know a lot of middle-aged women? More weak sauce.

[-] Arrakis@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

It means as much as what you said.

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago
[-] Arrakis@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago
[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Has this become a last word fight?

[-] Arrakis@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe if you're very sad and lonely.

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Let's find out.

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
92 points (97.9% liked)

United Kingdom

5117 readers
316 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS