631

The Biden administration on Thursday announced plans to remove medical bills from Americans' credit reports in a push to end what it called coercive debt collection tactics that affect millions of consumers.

Proposals under consideration would help families financially recover from medical crises, stop debt collectors from coercing people into paying bills they may not even owe, and ensure that creditors are not relying on data that is often plagued with inaccuracies and mistakes, Vice President Kamala Harris and Rohit Chopra, the top consumer finance watchdog, announced.

Harris told reporters that more than 100 million Americans had unpaid medical debt.

"Many of the debts people have accrued are due to medical emergencies," she said. "We know credit scores determine whether a person can have economic health and wellbeing, much less the ability to grow their wealth."

Chopra's agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, reported last year that roughly 20% of Americans have medical debt, but CFPB said its data also showed medical billing data is a poor indicator of whether consumers' are likely to pay down traditional debts.

The Brookings Institution think tank also found big gaps in medical debt statistics, with some 80% of debt held by households with zero or negative net worth, and communities of color hit especially hard. For instance, 27% of Black households hold medical debt compared with 16.8% of non-Black households.

According to the CFPB, the Fair Credit Reporting Act restricts the use of medical information in credit decisions and credit reports. The agency on Thursday announced policy outlines that could give rise to new regulations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Thank you. I'm doing okay. I've been very lucky

But some of the billing is insane.

Back around 2000 an 11 year old niece had a brain aneurysm at school and air transport was required.

The parents were shocked to get an $8000 bill for the helicopter.

This Feb the tab for me was 143,000. But I had bought REACH air transport insurance.

The funny thing was, the pilots had to meet another copter at my destination anyway. So it really wasn't costing them anything.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Wait... Did REACH charge you even though you have an annual membership?

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They initially denied coverage.

But it turned out they needed documentation from the hospital to prove a legit medical emergency.

So they covered it, but there were a couple of months that were pretty scary.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I'm so sorry for your undue stress, but I'm glad they ultimately did the right thing. I was poring through REACH's T&S last night looking for anything that might get someone out of such a ridiculous bill and was going to call my airlift EMT cousin this morning to ask for advice if I couldn't come up with anything.

Keep us posted on your progress, I hope you get to share some good news soon.

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I was pretty lucky, aside from the financial stuff.

I had a long run of good health and then got slammed with a week in hospital with pneumonia, Covid and chemotherapy.

I walked away with it one piece, but somehow ended up with Type 2 diabetes. That was why I ended up in the helicopter -- uncontrollable diabetic ketoacidosis. Turns out I was allergic to the diabetes medication.

I'm doing well now. I have Covid again but still have my job.

[-] ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

they needed documentation from the hospital to prove a legit medical emergency.

Do they think people are out there taking life fights in helicopters like they're taxis? So fucking ridiculous, I'm so sorry you even had to worry about something like that.

People who work for medical insurance companies need their heads examined. You must need a certain amount of psychopathy to get a paycheck from this kind of cruelty and then be able to sleep at night.

[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

These people are predators.

A few years back a couple of friends got appendicitis in separate situations.

In both instances the insurers initially denied the claims. They claimed the procedures were not medically necessary.

Appendicitis is fatal.

These fuckers make vampires look like saints.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
631 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19104 readers
1966 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS