38

One of the often-discussed issues in energy economics circles is the scope for EV charging, with its large loads, to make households more responsive to prices.

Greater responsiveness to prices suggests less upstream expenditure, better utilisation of capital and hence, potentially, lower prices. Or so the welfare economics theory goes. Regulators and some economists are “passionate” about this and see it as their life’s work to make prices “cost reflective”.

I have recently decided to upgrade from a plug-in hybrid car to an EV and so looked for the best charging offer. Did I find “cost reflective” tariffs that will make me more responsive to wholesale prices?

I did not need to look far to find fascinating information. My own retailer has an electricity “plan” (why are they called this, there is nothing in the nature of a “plan” about a set of prices?) that will charge my car for 8 cents per kWh if I plug in between 0h00 and 6h00.

As part of the plan they will also pay me 10 cents for each kWh that I feed into the grid from my PV (the regulated minimum is 4.9 cents) and a single rate for all other times that is a smidge higher than the Victorian Government’s “default offer” price.

Well, this is amazing. I will be worse off using my own PV to charge my car rather than to export my PV production to the grid. I would never have thought such a thing possible with feed-in rates that are not subsidised. What about the duck curve?

There is more. It might have struck you as strange that the cheap EV charging period does not correspond to the time of abundant solar. We have all heard about the “duck curve”. Long a thing in South Australia, it is now a thing in all the NEM’s markets except Tasmania.

Indeed we see this mid-day abundance in the wholesale prices. The average 5-minute wholesale (spot) price from 0h00 to 6h00 on all days for the year to 18 September 2023 (i.e. the average for those 26,280 five minute periods) in Victoria is 7.8 cents per kWh.

But for the 26,280 five minute periods between 10h00 and 16h00 it was just 1.2 cents per kWh. So why is my retailer not encouraging me to plug in then rather than between 0h00 and 6h00?

This is the obvious thing to expect, and the regulators (and often economists) are deeply wishing to see such load shift into the middle of the day to bring the duck’s belly up and its head down.

Let’s try a few answers. Customers with EVs are likely to prefer to start the day with a charged battery so will value an over-night charge more than a mid-day charge. Perhaps also my retailer thinks that many cars will not be at home to be charged in the middle of the day, so why offer something that will only have a few customers?

Contract markets, and the fact that my retailer is likely to rely on those markets (they do not own their own generation) is also likely to be part of the explanation.

For the year ahead I estimate my retailer can secure contracts for around 6 cents/kWh per kWh for electricity supplied between 0h00 and 6h00. But for supply during the 10h00 to 16h00 period they are likely to need to hold both “Base” and “Peak” contracts to hedge their exposure to spot prices. That brings the contract price to around 9 cents per kWh for supply at such time. The hedge jumps over the lazy spot

So, they can offer a comparably hedged price that is lower for supply between 0h00 and 6h00 than between 10h00 and 16h00, despite the fact that the spot prices point in exactly the opposite direction.

Contract prices might also go some way to explaining how my retailer can offer me 10 cents for my PV feed-in when the average spot price in the 6 hours that PV feeds back into the grid is just 1.2 cents (i.e. the equivalent price to my retailer is not 1.2 cents – they don’t buy from the spot market but rather the capped price of around 9 cents). Note to regulators: something to think about here next time you set minimum feed-in rates.

Finally let me also note that for my EV charging, my retailer also bears a network charge of 10 cents per kWh to pay Jemena to deliver the electricity to me. Amazingly my retailer is bearing this (presumably they expect to get this back on the margin on the electricity they sell me later in the day).

Wow. Can you imagine a tightly regulated market delivering such outcomes? Regulators would allow such things over their dead bodies.

But this is a market in action in the real world. Very different from what might be discussed in the class room of price/quantity charts assuming perfect competition.

So next time you engage in debate about duck curves, wholesale prices and customers’ responsiveness to prices, bear in mind that in reality the picture might be very different from what you expect from pre-conceived notions of how markets work and your bounded rationality. This was certainly the case for me. So much has changed in EV market

Finally, I can’t say which car I chose, but I can say the search was fascinating. What huge progress in such a short time. The last time I had a proper look at the EV market was as part of an advisory panel to the Victorian Government, a couple of years ago. Since then so much has changed.

The lithium iron phosphate battery (rare two years ago) in my chosen car can be expected to lose just 15% of its capacity after a million kilometres. This chemistry also relieves me of my concerns about nickel supply from the Congo and Russia.

The service costs for my car for 80,000 km (two services over this period) will be a touch over $1000 in total and I estimate it will cost me around $1.2 per 100km to run. Diesel or petrol cars are now around 20 times as much.

The fringe benefit tax concessions are remarkable and the car I have chosen is, I think, 9/10th of the market leader for 6/10th of the price.

Who anticipated such things? What else lies ahead that we have not had the imagination to conceive of?

There is much to grumble about, but developments in EV markets, aspects of Australian EV policies, and retail electricity markets deliver much hope for a rapid energy transition, and much food for thought.

Professor Bruce Mountain is the Director of the Victoria Energy Policy Centre

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fivemmvegemite@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hmm as an owner of a couple of EV’s, I’ve not seen the deals where electricity retailers offer this. I wonder if I’m missing out on something here.

My electricity bills have definitely gone up (over the winter as per usual). However, with roughly 5kw of solar and DST kicking in soon, I’ll be able to charge the cars almost solely from solar.

Cars with larger batteries will benefit from being able to do run around during the week and charge from solar during the weekend. Edit: I’ll note that for me (in Vic) it is still vastly cheaper to charge from solar than to feed the solar back into the grid.

Also, the tax concessions only seem to apply to these when buying new and also when doing them via leasing / ie as a company supplied vehicle. Please correct me if I’m wrong here.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
38 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3579 readers
119 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS