497
What do you think of framework and their methods?
(frame.work)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
497 points (97.9% liked)
Technology
59670 readers
1939 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Overall, they seem to be doing the right things for long-term ownership and repairability. As new hardware manufacturers, they're going to have a couple issues, just like their rechargeable bios battery design, but they've handled them well.
I would like them to open source their schematics, but they have contractual obligations preventing them from doing so, so making the schematics open after signing an NDA is a fair middle ground, and more than any other company will do. So kudos for that
I personally own a framework, and worked with them to fix a charging issue, and they did all the right things, professional, no issues at all.
One small issue that people seem to have, is their unwillingness to talk about core boot or libre boot, but that's a small thing.
They are a startup, so you always have to question what revenue streams they're envisioning long-term.
They're my kind of crazy: I hope they succeed, at least I hope they start industry trend for repairability and long-term ownership.
It would be amazing if they succeeded. Would be nice to be able to grab the motherboard of your old laptop and recycle it into a home server type device, sell your display to someone that can easily use it for personal projects, etc.
If they do it right their old boards could be used for the kind of stuff people buy raspberry pi's for as well.
That is already being done right now.
You can fashion your old Mainboard into a home server. For example by using their case made in collaboration with I think CooperMaster but you can also 3D print it yourself.
The displays are just standard eDP connectors. So anyone could use that as well with a cheap board.
Yeah, I saw hobbyists are doing it already, but it you could use mass produced cases to fit them in any form factor it opens up the possibility for long term use of motherboards that would end up scrapped otherwise.
https://frame.work/gb/en/products/cooler-master-mainboard-case
100% agreed. If they could come up with some GPL3 framework foundation, that open source to schematic designs, after I don't know 5 years. So the designs are older, but it's open, so that people can fashion all of their devices into completely reusable modules. I'd love that.
They're doing a reasonable job by open sourcing their interfaces, which is good.
It's a major issue for me - currently I'm keeping my old x230 alive, but eventually that'll have to be replaced.
I'm running it with heads, which allows me to do secure boot under my control. I don't really want to have my main notebook without that nowadays.
I don't like any of the current notebook keyboards, so it'll be a "build yourself" project anyway - and the framework mainboard would be nice as they keep the dimensions stable, even though I'm not a fan of some other hardware choices.
My impression of the GitHub discussion on core boot, was that it's on their backlog. But one of the bug submitters was very vocal, would a commitments, and basically got the developers to close the issue kind of emotionally.
I think it's something they want to do, long-term, but they're not actively working on it.
Out of curiosity what are the other hardware issues?
I'm generally not a friend of their USB-C expansion modules - which is mainly due to lots of experience trying to expand older notebooks with USB stuff. USB is not designed for devices to keep a state over suspends, so depending on what kind of hardware you plug in you get interesting results. This may be better with current spec (at least I hope they fixed some of that stuff when they worked on USB-C docking), but given how much I've seen fail I don't feel comfortable to fully rely on that.
I'd have preferred to have a few more mPCIe-slots (I think they just have one for the WLan module), and more storage slots (which I think they finally fixed with the latest mainboard version with two NVME slots). Also what they've done about the connection for the separate graphics card might solve my complaints about lack of mPCIe-slots.
If we not only look at the mainboard, but the complete notebook - I don't like the keyboard, the screen, the case in general, and the fixed battery - but unfortunately all those are bad on pretty much any notebook younger than 10 years.
I should add, no matter how much I agree with the company, I won't do pre-orders. I know framework is my kind of crazy, I can't encourage anybody to do a pre-order either.
I bought my framework from in stock series 13s.
There's too much risk tying up capital for months, plus you lose your credit card protections, when it's been over 30 days. If I buy an in stock unit, have it delivered, and it's terrible, worst case scenario I do a credit card charge back. I'd lose that capability if I do a pre-order 345 months out.
If you preorder, just 100 $/€ are taken from your credit card. The rest is booked shortly before the device gets shipped. So, your risk is 100$/€ if they went bankrupt before you get your device. I have seen worse, imho.