499
submitted 1 year ago by s08nlql9@lemm.ee to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Onurb@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

This is a reasonable response if you look at this situation in a vacuum. But sadly the open source community got burned a bunch of times already by big private corps. Of course they dont destroy all open source. If it helps them they actually help develop it and only try to overtake it in the democratic sense to gain the most voting and controlling power. But Facebook is absolutely not in a benefit of the doubt situation. They need to show a hell of a lot of good faith and need to be a tiny enough fraction of the userbase in the fediverse to be trusted in my opinion.

[-] theterrasque@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Got some examples? And please, something other than xmpp. That feel apart under it's own weight.

When it comes to open source and open standards, Facebook have done quite a lot. React, react native, llama, graphql, relay, pytorch, docosaurus, zstd, flipper, redux, infer, lexical, jsx and a lot more at https://GitHub.com/facebook

Facebook have already contributed a lot to open source and open standards. Why do you say they won't continue to do that?

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
499 points (95.4% liked)

Fediverse

28518 readers
166 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS