534
submitted 1 year ago by tintory@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] venorathebarbarian@lemmy.world 198 points 1 year ago

Man, I hope I live to see the day that these greedy bastards lose a huge chunk of their business to free filing via the IRS. They've been fighting to keep tax paying citizens from getting what they want from their government for years. It's gross.

I want to see this free filing happen both for the good it'll do and because I want to see Intuit's stock plummet. Fuck Intuit.

"It'S gOiNg tO HuRt bLaCk pEoPle" fuck off you dirty liars.

[-] joekar1990@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Between Intuit and some of these money transfer applications (venmo, cashapp etc) they are pivoting hard to diversify and lobbying hard with the government looking to finally come more into the 21st century. Free tax filing and fednow could be very good for the everyday person.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

What's the issue with Venmo and cashapp?

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

In other countries the government has an app thats free and plays that role. Instead of a corporation trying to make money.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

You're talking about countries that have state banks? Like who?

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Its not a bank, the government covers the same service Meta, or Venmo does here with electronic payments from your phone. Its like free wire transfers for everyone. It helps people spend and move money.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah kinda like the federal reserve ;)

[-] porksoda@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

My beef is that they want to act like banks, but with none of the oversight and regulations of an actual bank. Ever had a real problem with PayPal? Say what you want about the banking industry, but I can get a real US -based person on the phone within 10 minutes to help me solve my problem.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

First of all. Primus sucks! and I should have taken your name.

On the subject, didn't PayPal get hit with regulations finally or did I make that up in my head?
Very true about actually getting in contact with someone. The best you can do is chat support, and I've been through that just to change my phone number with them cuz the app glitched out on me. Took two weeks to get it changed.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's probably one of the bolder bad faith arguments I've ever seen. It is transparently BS. I don't think Intuit has heard of the Evil Overlord List. Clearly they forgot to have a 5-year-old child on their payroll to double check all their evil plans.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Where was that 5-year-old at Unity? Didn't he tell them about how he went to the different bathroom when his bullies started charging him 5 cents every time he had to pee?

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

They pulled the black card. You can't argue against that.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago

Why do u hate black people, bigot?

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Either you might want to add an /s or realize my post has a /s.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

i feel like adding /s loses the /s effect

considering you were doing /s with out putting /s... i feel attacked.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This all started when Trump got elected. The stupid people got emboldened and are openly speaking and now you can't tell when someone is being sarcastic because we now know there are honestly people out there who would say the same thing, but seriously.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

That or sarcasm often requires vocal manipulation to be expressed and text can't convey that very well.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If your comment really was /s yours failed because you went against the joke and not with it.

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I wasn't myself quite sure you got the sarcasm but think others were less sure. All good.

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Intuit actually makes some really good products. I'd like to see pre-prepared returns from the irs also, with the option to update/amend at the taxpayer's discretion if necessary. That way Intuit could focus on their higher level products for bigger more sophisticated taxpayers that truly do need excellent software.

[-] venorathebarbarian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

One can make really good products and still be such unmitigated cunts that they should lose that business altogether.

They've spent insane amounts of money lobbying the government to keep poor AF people easily able to be tricked into paying for their tax return all while advertising a hard to find free service. Paying people we pay for with our tax dollars so that more of our hard earned cash can flow into their pockets. And if they spent insane amounts to keep it that way you know full well they're making that amount back and then some. Off of us.

They're evil. No offense to you, but fuck their really good products.

[-] solstice@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

What do you propose then, corporate execution and then toss their products in the garbage?

[-] venorathebarbarian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yep, sure. I'm okay with that. It makes more sense that someone else buys the company than to throw it in the trash, but regardless I don't see how "they make good products" is an excuse for the manipulation of our government on the scale they've engaged in.

If more corporations faced the death penalty for the shit they pull they'd be way less likely to pull it. (To be clear I'm referring to the company being sold and/or the leaders going to jail, depending on the offense, not literally executing the heads of corporations)

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I don't disagree but I'm confused where you think I said good software excuses lobbying against pre-prepared returns. I'm fairly certain I said the opposite.

[-] venorathebarbarian@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

To me this is how our conversation thread goes:

Me: I hope they crash and burn

You: They actually make good products, I hope this tax stuff goes away so they can focus on their good products

Me: Nah, fuck them, I hope they crash and burn for what they've done

You: And throw their good products in the trash?

That to me sounds like you think their good products should save them from the Find Out portion of Fucking Around. Please correct me if I misunderstood you, but that's how the conversation reads to me.

[-] solstice@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

man I don't want to fight about this, everyone is so fucking aggressive here and I'm sick of it.

[-] venorathebarbarian@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm sorry my reply came off as aggressive, I truly wasn't trying to be. These times are incredibly frustrating, we just want good products from good companies that don't do fucked up shit, and that seems to be too much to ask for ?? It sucks.

But I have no problem with you personally, we're all trapped in this stupid system together. Be well, my dude. I'm sorry my reply caused you stress, it wasn't my intention.

Edit: I see that you have downvotes and want you to know they're not from me

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
534 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3504 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS