534
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
534 points (98.7% liked)
politics
18883 readers
3504 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The article doesn't make it super clear what the basis for this claim is. I'll try to summarize as best I can, and welcome anyone to correct me.
They're saying that an IRS program to prefill tax information for the taxpayer (like what is done in so many other countries) would cause many people to miss tax credits. The tax credit they're referring to is the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), which is "aimed at low-income, working class parents," who usually earn less than $20K/yr. Since Black people in America have disproportionately lower incomes, this is how simplifiying taxes across the board for everyone would "hurt Black people." And that Black people are audited at a rate three to five times the average taxpayer.
But wait. That increase in auditing is because of the EITC. "For decades, the IRS has disproportionately audited EITC claimants because of pressure from Republicans in Congress as well as laws that require a special focus on “improper payments.”"
In fact, free assisted filing would ensure that more people appropriately get the EITC, and fewer people would be likely to claim it when they shouldn't. Which (in concert with "stop over-auditing people just because they claimed EITC," which is already happening) will reduce the auditing problem.
Basis for the claim is that they this are we are all stupid poor plebs and they can say whatever without any real push back since fake news and politicians will repeat it for them.