596
Biden says UAW should fight for 40% pay raise in Michigan strike visit
(www.reuters.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
596 points (97.6% liked)
News
23259 readers
3519 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Did he though? His Congress pushed through a bill with a smaller compensation package, 1(one) day of sick time, no removal of advance notice for sick time, none of the OT protections, and no acknowledgement of safety concerns.
Hih
I mean, just because they're cool with a shitty deal doesn't mean it wasn't a shitty deal.
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled, after all.
asdfasfsaf
No, but just because they’re cool with a shitty deal doesn’t mean it wasn’t a shitty deal.
It’s easier to fool someone than to convince them they’ve been fooled, after all.
sadfasfsadf
Err.. what? I copied and pasted what I wrote before because it was a sufficient response to your comment.
You seem to have this weird idea that just because they accepted the deal, that it was a good deal. I said that's not necessarily true. Then you replied saying "yes it is, they know more than you" which completely ignores my point, so I re-iterated it.
sadfasdf
Lol, what? I'm countering the point that just because they've accepted it doesn't mean it's good.
Just because they are union workers doesn't mean they weren't taken advantage of.
What about this is so hard for you to understand?
You seem to think that any deal they would've taken is a good deal, because they know more about it than you do. That's a classic appeal to authority, and it's hilarious that you're trying to defend it.
Anyways, goodbye man.
asdfsafasdfad
Right. Good thing is I'm not here to convince you.
I never said their deal was bad.
This is just you replacing my point with something that is easier to argue against. I see it all the time.
Go right on ahead man. That doesn't invalidate my point.
Dyisykskgskt
Anyways man, have a nice day.
Hfzgixitsitdiyx
I got a bit upset about you saying I was fueling right-wing talking points, so my bad. I'll always fight on the side of labor, even if the Republican party is trying to make them the ball in political games.
Personally I think it would have turned out much better for their union after even a day on strike, but I guess we'll never know. My point is not "they didn't get what they wanted but got something good", it's that the deal was forcibly imposed on them without any other options. I was not aware of the aftermath of the deal so I appreciate you highlighting it, but it still falls short in my eyes. Were I in their union, I'd be a minority opposed to the outcome. But that's the thing, I'm just a guy on the Internet, not a member of IBEW, SMART-MD, or IBT (CWA guy in the tech industry, actually).
I trust you to do the right thing, I don't need a screen shot. Thank you for putting up.
Dabsvsvabsnsgn
This exchange is why I treasure lemmy. Thank you both
You accused them of listening to Hannity, so uh
Heidisjjwnsnsjwk
This necessarily implies anyone who disagrees listens to Hannity.
Hmhshfbbdwjsj
No, I'm mad that you smeared everyone who disagrees with you. It was a "joke" but one where we are supposed to be the punchline.
And then you started whining about civility.
Hejjdnriwis
Ooof
You'll never get satisfaction from who you're responding to, but good on you for doing it.
asdfasf
As long as you were. Carry on friend!
asdfasfsdf