27
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] uphillbothways@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I read all the theories. All I can muster is 'oh no, not Russia's pipeline.' Seems like however you cut it, Russia did this to themselves by invading Ukraine. They were kind of on a more decent path towards meaningful integration for a minute. Would have been good for common Russians and everyone else if they'd stayed on that path. But, instead their leadership decided on extreme aggression.

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

Didn't German and Dutch companies fund Nordstream 2? "Russia's pipeline" indeed.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Doesn't really matter who paid for it so long as it's intent is to send oil/gas one way and huge amounts of money the other way.

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

It's infrastructure that Germany and the Netherlands funded. Why doesn't it matter?

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Because it wasn't blown up because of who funded it but rather who it benefits most. I'm not saying it's right but it's at least a save thought.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

It does matter, as Germany is a NATO member, and the pipelines were critical infrastructure and blowing them up would be an act of war.

load more comments (17 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
27 points (63.4% liked)

World News

32327 readers
498 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS