27
submitted 2 years ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] uphillbothways@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I read all the theories. All I can muster is 'oh no, not Russia's pipeline.' Seems like however you cut it, Russia did this to themselves by invading Ukraine. They were kind of on a more decent path towards meaningful integration for a minute. Would have been good for common Russians and everyone else if they'd stayed on that path. But, instead their leadership decided on extreme aggression.

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago

Didn't German and Dutch companies fund Nordstream 2? "Russia's pipeline" indeed.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Doesn't really matter who paid for it so long as it's intent is to send oil/gas one way and huge amounts of money the other way.

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago

It's infrastructure that Germany and the Netherlands funded. Why doesn't it matter?

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

Because it wasn't blown up because of who funded it but rather who it benefits most. I'm not saying it's right but it's at least a save thought.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

It does matter, as Germany is a NATO member, and the pipelines were critical infrastructure and blowing them up would be an act of war.

load more comments (17 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
27 points (63.4% liked)

World News

36792 readers
592 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS