submitted 1 year ago by 0x0@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I currently maintain a legacy C+ app that runs on x86/x86_64/armhf linux, all 4 android archs and x86/x86_64 windows.

The linux compilation phase takes 1m, whereas on windows (using MinGW) it takes 10m. It's not the end of the world, but would the MS compiler be faster? Better?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] aard@kyu.de 23 points 1 year ago

From the perspective of the CI guy: Just cross compile from Linux.

You can get the Windows compilers for free - just CLI build tools are enough for your case. The setup can be a bit messy, though. Also, if it's a GCC only codebase so far there's a decent chance it has constructs which will not compile on MSVC. It will not necessarily be faster, though.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

if it’s a GCC only codebase so far there’s a decent chance it has constructs which will not compile on MSVC

Yeah in recent experiments i thing i've hit that wall... next experiment: mingw on linux.

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023

10 points (85.7% liked)

Programming

17314 readers

86 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz