1054
Dianne Feinstein dies at 90
(abc7news.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
1054 points (99.1% liked)
politics
19107 readers
2008 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
don't speak ill of the dead don't speak ill of the dead don't speak ill of the dead
I believe this rule of basic decency does not apply to politicians or the ultra wealthy. Only other humans.
Fuck the dead. Speak your peace. What they gonna do? Rot on you?
It's more of a matter of what goes around comes around.
Yes. Yes, it is. Something you'll learn, in time.
Wasn't speaking about karma. I was speaking towards wisdom from life experiences.
If you aren't a POS, you have nothing to worry about. Its impolite to say it when she's alive at 90, its impolite now, when are we supposed to call her out for terrible behavior exactly?
Because every human being is 100% perfect and has never had any POS moments in their life, right?
Respect for the dead is a real thing. Talking shit to someone's face is allot braver than talking behind their back when they're buried in the ground.
If all you got as a reply is to correct someone's spelling then that's a pretty damn weak reply.
Not that you'd care, but the voice-to-text feature on my phone has its own mind.
Of course everyone has had bad moments. They are part of the truth though, and should be spoken of publically where appropriate. Judge people by their entire life, not only by the good parts. We as a society were not brave enough to demand she step down 3 years ago, but we can at least do her the courtesy of not lying anymore now that she's dead.
Don't remember her condition being public knowledge 3 years ago?
The condition of being 90?
Its not the age, its the mileage (cognitive abilitiy), that matters.
/facepalm Is it reall that hard to understand that some people are more mentally healthy/whole at an age than others at the same age?
I get young people wanting to bash older people for bashing sake, makes them feel better. But there's no truth to that, only selfish satisfaction.
I have no interest in bashing old people, but I will literally believe it when I see it. There is truth to the fact that old people die, quite often. If someone can prove they're mentally and physically fit at age 90,more power to them. But if they can't pass a test that proves they are able, they shouldnt be allowed in the Senate. Its not rude to assume the thing that's almost always true about a group is true for an individual in that group.
Agree, for mentally. That's all I've ever been saying, that we shouldn't just arbitrarily based on a numeric value stop a person from working, but instead, as long as they're able to work let them, regardless of their physical age.
There are cognitive tests that exist today, medical practitioners already use them.
For physically, we had a president fight and win a war from a wheelchair. As long as they have a physical constitution for long hours during crisis situations I believe that's all that would really matter.
At the end of the day a president makes decisions and then delegates to others to have those decisions fulfilled, and that's a mental thing moreso than physical.
Yeah, by physically I meant more along the lines of "isn't probably going to have a heart attack tomorrow". And we need to be assuming incapability after a certain age, until proven otherwise. When a senator turns 75 or 80, they should be automatically retired unless they choose to prove their capability, with public oversight of the test results.
We don't do that with older pilots, that's discriminatory to do it to them or anyone else. We're a nation of innocent until proven guilty.
Just give them a yearly cognitive test, that should waive any concerns someone would have.
Definitely this. If there's ever one group of our society that would try to get around the rules for their own benefit it would be politicians.
We should do that with pilots if we aren't. Not letting you be in a highly important position is not discrimination. There is a real concern over capability to do the job. Being a senator and flying a plane are not rights.
At least Romney took the hint. But as much as I’d like to say good riddance, these days it seems like he’s one of the only rational republicans left in Congress.
It’s crazy. Romney is not some great person, but compared to the rest of his party, he looks like a beacon of hope for the return of debate about policy positions (gross as they may be) rather than having your constituents threaten and attack your opponents.
He gets his place in history though, as the only person to ever go against their party to do the right thing in an impeachment vote. (In addition to the whole presidential candidacy thing)
He is grounded by some principals, the rest of the party is free to drive right off a cliff.
While I understand the sentiment, it honestly seems misplaced. We should be able to have completely honest conversations about the dead, even if it is conversations about the terrible things they did. A lot of dead people deserve people speaking ill about them.
I agree but it's uncouth and surely someone would get upset.