view the rest of the comments
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Jfc. I do my best to avoid porn and everything, but who fucking cares? Fucked up priorities.
Eh, deal with it. I'd rather have a moonlighting teacher than an unqualified one. At least this teacher was smart enough to not settle for $42k/year.
Lol as a teenager who had an attractive teacher for a class, I don't know if you understand what they're saying.
Teenagers are kids. Kids are, by their very nature, stupid. If they know said teacher is actively publishing content to an OF, they are absolutely going to find said content. It's just a whole mess for all parties involved.
Adults should absolutely be able to live their lives, but accept that kids are kids and kids do stupid shit.
What a small world. My social studies teacher was also banging a student. Did yours also end up in jail?
On the surface I agree but these are teenagers. What do you think the chances are of one of them subbing to her account and requesting her to make custom videos for them 😂 I would say pretty damn high. Hell it's still probably going to happen but at least the kids won't be sitting in class while watching videos of their teacher getting fucked.
Lots of high schoolers have jobs and bank accounts with debit cards starting at 16.
Interesting. It's been quite a while since I was that age, so I don't really remember needing a parental co-signer. One more thing, supposedly prepaid visa cards work so there's always that.
Have you ever been around highschool kids?... They're definitely going to make it a problem if they find out.
Why the hell would they get access to her videos?
They're horny teens with a hot teacher. 100000% a teen dream for most that age who are into ladies.
They can be horny all they want, it wont conjure a link to a specific person you dont even know has done any porn.
No, but you can bet their asses they're looking for the link to their old teacher's OF now.
I agree. She can't continue teaching high school or probably even middle school boys once this comes out. She'd probably be fine teaching elementary age kids. There'd be a lot more dads attending parent-teacher conferences so it might even be a positive thing.
Why not? We need to stop treating sex workers like they are subhuman. The fact that parents aren't monitoring their childrens internet behavior isn't a reason to limit another person's career prospects if they chose to monetize their bodies past or present.
As long as the teacher in question isn't advertising her pornographic career or material to her students then why can't she continue to teach and earn money on the side as long as she's not bringing it into the classroom?