271
submitted 1 year ago by dvtt@lemmings.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org -2 points 1 year ago

Why do you suppose dating is worse now? I will disagree any time and place with people who say online dating is awful. The alternative -- randomly hitting on people and hoping a million unknowable factors all line up -- is far worse.

[-] SickPanda@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

You are joking right? Online dating is even worse than offline dating.

First of all there are far more men using online dating than women.

Second men like and Text way to many women which leads women's inboxes to be overfilled.

Most of the few available women only want the top 15% of the men.

Then the dead profiles aka. only their Instagram username tagged in bio.

And there are also those who chat with you for a few days and then try to sell their adult content to you or want you to invest in crypto XY.

I've met my gf on a dating platform 5 years ago and the online dating situation was bad then already. I occasionally saw the posts in r/tinder and oh boy has that thing become a shitshow since then.

[-] escaped_cruzader@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Why do you suppose dating is worse now?

Globalization and social media

Just read the articles on Tinder, it's a sad affair for the not attractive man

When all men you had access to where the village boys you won't be that picky. Once the whole world can sext you, why settle for the ok dude that looks nice in a suit if you squint enough?

[-] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 2 points 1 year ago

I don't need to read articles, I have years of actual first hand experience

[-] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It goes both ways for "not attractive" women as well.

This is purely anecdotal, but all of the "not attractive" men I have known who complain there's no women online for them are only talking about women who are more attractive than them. The ones who don't complain have realistic standards and can find matches. It also tends to help they don't have s shit attitude.

But it's still a numbers game. More attractive people get more matches, but that doesn't mean those are quality matches. I guess if all you're looking for is casual sex it makes a difference.

[-] escaped_cruzader@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It goes both ways for “not attractive” women as well

It does not, unless you mean "grotesquely not attractive"? Just read the articles, women are ruthless when rating men, so even "average" men can't get "average", or less-than, women (online dating)

But it’s still a numbers game

You are underestimating the numbers by too much

[-] dvtt@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

most online dating apps want you to engage in casual sex and not find success because then you'll keep coming back. TInder, Bumble, etc. are first and foremost hookup apps and it's important to remember that.

It's been my experience that meeting people in person works and online dating just doesn't. I'm not saying all the female profiles on dating sites are fakes generated by the site to tempt men into subscribing, but I definitely am saying that if they were, my experience wouldn't have been different.

[-] dvtt@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

the entire concept of an incel did not exist until tinder came about. Read the article and paper. Hookup apps promote the type of promiscuous/chad behavior that incels want and fail to achieve ... thus causing their frustration

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
271 points (91.2% liked)

News

23287 readers
3788 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS