511
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ram@bookwormstory.social to c/news@lemmy.world

LEESBURG, Va. — After two days of testimony, the man who shot a 21-year-old YouTuber inside Dulles Town Center on video in April has been found not guilty on two charges of malicious wounding.

The jury found Alan Colie not guilty of aggravated malicious wounding or use of a firearm for aggravated malicious wounding, however, he was found guilty of firing a gun inside the mall. That guilty verdict has been set aside until a hearing to discuss it on October 19.

Colie, a DoorDash driver, was on trial for shooting Tanner Cook, the man behind the YouTube channel "Classified Goons," at the Dulles Town Center back in April. Colie admitted to shooting Cook when he took the stand Wednesday but claimed it was self-defense.

The case went viral not because there was a shooting inside a mall, but because Cook is known to make prank videos. Cook amassed 55,000 subscribers with an average income of up to $3,000 per month. He said he elicits responses to entertain viewers and called his pranks “comedy content.”

Colie faced three charges, including aggravated malicious wounding, malicious discharge of a firearm within an occupied dwelling, and use of firearm for aggravated malicious wounding. The jury had to weigh different factors including if Colie had malicious intent and had reasonable fear of imminent danger of bodily harm.

Cook was in the courtroom when jurors were shown footage of him getting shot near the stomach -- a video that has not yet been made public. Cook's mother, however, left the courtroom to avoid watching the key piece of evidence in her son's shooting.

The footage was recorded by one of Cook's friends, who was helping to record a prank video for Cook's channel. The video shows Cook holding his phone near Colie’s ear and using Google Translate to play a phrase out loud four times, while Colie backed away.

When he testified, Colie recalled how Cook and his friend approached him from behind and put the phone about 6 inches away from his face. He described feeling confused by the phrase Cook was playing. Colie told the jury the two looked “really cold and angry.” He also acknowledged carrying a gun during work as a way to protect himself after seeing reports of other delivery service drivers being robbed.

"Colie walked into the mall to do his job with no intention of interacting with Tanner Cook. None," Adam Pouilliard, Colie's defense attorney, said. "He’s sitting next to his defense attorneys right now. How’s that for a consequence?”

The Commonwealth argued that Cook was never armed, never placed hands on Colie and never posed a threat. They stressed that just because Cook may not seem like a saint or his occupation makes him appear undesirable, that a conviction is warranted.

"We don’t like our personal space invaded, but that does not justify the ability to shoot someone in a public space during an interaction that lasted for only 20 seconds," Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Eden Holmes said.

The jury began deliberating around 11:30 a.m. Thursday. Shortly after 3:30 p.m., the jury came back saying they were divided and couldn’t come to a resolution. The judge instructed them to continue deliberating and later returned with the not-guilty verdict.

WUSA9 caught up with the Cook family following the verdict. When we asked Tanner Cook how he felt about the outcome, he said it is all up to God.

"I really don't care, I mean it is what it is," he said. "It's God's plan at the end of the day."

His mother, Marla Elam, said the family respects the jury and that the Cook family is just thankful Tanner is alive.

"Nothing else matters right now," she said.

Here's the video by NBC Washington, apologies that it's served by Discord

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

So shooting in a mall is safe for everyone else?

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social -1 points 1 year ago

Why would a single round fired into an assailant be unsafe for anyone other than that assailant?

Do you believe bullets travel on some trajectory not subject to the rules of physics, curving around randomly?

[-] bastion@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Give him some slack. He doesn't like it, and so he feels unsafe, and would rather not have to think about danger at all.

Now that we're human, we've evolved beyond such things as danger, personal responsibility, right to self defense, etc.

/s, in case that isn't clear to anyone.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

The country I live in would throw the shooter’s ass in jail for that shit.

YouTuber was no saint, but shooting someone for getting in your face is a sign you’re weak as hell.

[-] bastion@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

You're taking, but all I hear is Satan's Maggoty Cum Fart.

It's always a great look when you have to resort to an ad hominem.

[-] bastion@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

You mean, your actual username?

It’s okay if you have nothing else to add to this conversation.

[-] bastion@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

I guess we’ll see what the court says next month!

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

To be clear, the court has already said he was perfectly justified from the self-defense perspective. I look forward to it clearing him of the "firing indoors" nonsense.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

The charge he was found guilty of by the jury?

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

The same charge pending judge review due to its inconsistency with having acted in self-defense?

Colie’s defense attorney, Adam Pouilliard, said the conviction on the firearms charge is inconsistent with the law, given Colie’s acquittal on self-defense grounds. He asked the judge to set aside the conviction. A judge will hear arguments on the issue at a hearing next month.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

So they didn’t find him guilty of that charge?

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

As we've covered, the same charge I look forward to the court clearing him of next month. If you're still having trouble with the concept beyond this, I'm going to leave it to you to figure out.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

It sounds like we both are saying that he was found guilty but both are looking forward to what the court says, I’m not sure why you’re being disagreeable.

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
511 points (98.3% liked)

News

23409 readers
1924 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS