100
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

This is blatantly untrue. Dams act like huge batteries that can be used to smoothen out the load if demand or supply drop.

It should be used in conjunction with other sustainable energy methods. Over production can be used to pump up water and if production of wind and solar drops (as they tend to). Water electricity can fill the gap.

Power grids are very complex and require great forethought and balancing options. If water energy cannot be used, nuclear is the best balancing power.

[-] Hypx@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

The dam still causes huge environmental damage though. We may not want to use dams like that.

[-] Longpork_afficianado@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago

For a dam which already exists, surely keeping it in use makes more sense than decommissioning it in favour of fossil fuels though?

We probably shouldn't be building any more, but unless our grid is already completely renewable, hydro stations are the last ones we should be taking offline.

[-] Hypx@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

For the time being, dams will have to exist. But eventually, there will come a time when we won't need nearly as many dams.

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
100 points (97.2% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

9 readers
2 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS