99
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just like how in climate change is that we use plastic straws, don't look at how 80% of the pollution is industrial and/or Chinese in origin.

Or in Canada where rents are so high in Vancouver and Toronto that they're redefining budgeting for renters, from 1/3 to half and even 2/3rds instead of dealing with real estate speculation.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago

Are you saying China is responsible for 80% of emissions? That’s definitely false.

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Badly written. 80% are industrial. They are, based on their public numbers, responsible for a third of the world's CO2 though.

Their official numbers put them at number 1 CO2 emitter, and pollute more then next 5.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Well it just seems odd to fold together industrial and Chinese emissions. Nationally and by sector are two totally different ways of dividing up emissions.

Anyway China is a major source of emissions and deserves criticism for that but it doesn’t seem very relevant overall.

[-] chiraag@mastodon.online -3 points 1 year ago

@Kbin_space_program @throws_lemy @LibertyLizard As pointed out elsewhere, it's quite hypocritical to point to China to reduce emissions generated by manufacturing stuff for the West.

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

That was partially true more than a decade ago, since they could have had laws in place to prevent those emissions.

Now though they're more making things for themselves, and any attempt on their part to declare themselves a "developing country" is a sham.

[-] chiraag@mastodon.online -4 points 1 year ago

@Kbin_space_program @throws_lemy @LibertyLizard Or, you know, we could trace those emissions back to the source, which would land the blame squarely on the tons of US companies responsible.

Also, as an aside, why don't you compare per capita emissions, since China has > 3 times the population of the US?

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Because the ecosystem doesn't care about pollution per capita.

Also, the reason the US is so high is because it refines most of the world's oil.

Same reason Canada is so high. Alberta, by itself, is more than half of Canada CO2 emissions.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

and even if it was true, guess why they have so much emissions! It's to make products for us consumers in the west!

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Yes although I think China is a wealthy and capable enough country at this point that we can expect them to start reducing emissions like most other countries. But they aren’t really attempting to do this, and deserve criticism for that. As do Westerners who uncritically buy products from them despite their deeply problematic production model.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
99 points (97.1% liked)

science

14595 readers
76 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS