279
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Sure it is a thing but JavaScript on that domain can access it either injected or provided by the site. This is quite risky. Cookies can be http only so that client code cant access it.

[-] Zzombiee2361@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

How is storing hideCookieBanner: false on local storage risky?

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

What would the benefit of storing that in local storage?

[-] bighi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Remembering that the user asked to not see that banner again.

[-] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago
[-] bighi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because we were talking about how to save that information without using cookies. Setting a cookie would break the one thing that the conversation was about, wouldn't it?

If we're in a fun conversation about how to enter your home without using the door, would you be the one saying "I have an idea, I have an idea: use the door"?

[-] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

It was clearly a reference to the so called 'cookie laws' requiring permission for tracking cookies. However, cookies that are not for tracking purposes do not require any form of consent.

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2021
279 points (99.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32415 readers
980 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS