197
submitted 1 year ago by nodsocket@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Synthead@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree with a blend of socialism and capitalism, and in the right places. The US has healthcare in the same category as PlayStations. I don't think this makes sense.

We should believe in healthy, educated Americans as a common ground. And if you want to save up for a PlayStation, go for it.

Ironically, since the government hasn't fully stepped in to provide healthcare, coverage has moved to the private sector. So you still have socialist healthcare, just with shitty insurance companies trying to find ways to make billions of dollars from sick individuals.

I think we can do better. Do you?

[-] grilled_cheese_eater@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

There's no need for any privatization. We can simply have a market socialist economy that works on the principles of worker and customer owned companies.

Basically, we can have utility companies (and that type of stuff) be owned equally by the citizens they serve, have all the other companies be heavily antitrust regulated and owned equaly by the workers of said companies through the worker cooperative corporate structure.

Conflict of interest things (like healthcare) can simply be government programs.

This way, we preserve the market and the Playstation while at the same time ensuring that Sony makes more moral choices and pays all their workers fairly.

There's no need for Uber rich people to even exist, functioning examples of worker cooperative companies exist (For example, Mondragon Group in Spain).

I belive profit itself should be eliminated, we can do just fine without it.

[-] Synthead@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

If I have a broken car and want to sell it to my neighbor, how can I do that if profit is eliminated?

[-] grilled_cheese_eater@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I meant corporate profit. Selling your used car wouldn't earn you any profit in the first place and even if it did, you would be your very own self employed employee.

I meant profit as the money that instead of through fair wages for actual employees is distributed through dividends to shareholders.

I thought everyone had the same definition of the word "profit", but I guess not.

load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
197 points (85.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43822 readers
1065 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS