423
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 89 points 1 year ago

You don't need a car in Singapore. Public transit is quite good and it isn't that big of a city

[-] Alteon@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

I'm not disagreeing with you. But the only people that get the right to travel in a car are the rich. Rather than it be based on a needs-based system or lottery system. The rich get the right, but normal people don't. That's the point he's trying to make.

[-] mayonaise_met@feddit.nl 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it's a clever way to get rich people to pay high taxes. Singapore is just not a place suited for private cars for the able bodied. The same policy in other countries wouldn't be fair, but I could probably see it work in Manhattan or in the canal district in Old Amsterdam.

[-] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

The catch is you don't need a car in Singapore. It's less than half the size of London with an incredible public transit system.

The need isn't really there and the costs of maintaining one is very high. You aren't going to have many if any poor people who could afford a car to begin with.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'm hella anti car but I agree with you. Car ownership should not be gated behind a crazy one time fee preventing all but wealthy people from driving. Design your cities properly and make insurance expensive enough to cover the increased cost of infrastructure required to accommodate private vehicles. If someone wants to waste their money on a car when they can more easily take transit/active transportation then they should be able to.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have no idea what you’re saying here .. It’s fairer to jack up insurance to not be affordable, than to make the car unaffordable to begin with?

Design your cities properly

They’re talking Singapore. It’s an island city with excellent transit, plus quite walkable. This is the poster child for “designing your cities properly”

[-] fat_stig@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You can travel in a car, Uber, Grab and taxis allow you that convenience if you really need to go by car. It's not about rich and poor. Having lived in SG and in HK, the public transport systems are really good, but I never felt the need for a car, indeed in HK the cost of parking alone is way higher than to use public transport. I have friends that live in the smaller villages that cannot survive without a car, but all they use it for is to drive to a convenient public transport hub.

I'm a petrol head, I love cars and now I'm living somewhere that has almost no public transport, so I now have a car again and I enjoy the freedom and fun that I love about car ownership. But it doesn't change my opinion about using public transport where it is the better option.

[-] Alteon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Again, I'm not disagreeing with you about the good of public transit. I'm simply stating that car ownership is determined by how much money you have. The rich are allowed cars. You are not. That in and of itself is an unjust system regardless of how good or abysmal the public transit it. They are two totally different things.

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
423 points (98.0% liked)

World News

39396 readers
2956 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS