66

Many "accidental Americans" filed a lawsuit after the State Department announced it would lower the fee to renounce citizenship.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 26 points 2 years ago

I didn't realize that incurring a cost before it was reduced was lawsuit worthy. I'll have to remember that next time I buy something before a price drop.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago

It sounds like they're arguing that the increase was unnecessary, and done to dissuade people from doing it, rather than being reflective of the costs of the process. When they undid the price increase to be in line with other foreign services, they felt that showed that their claim has merit.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

But the claim to begin with was that they increased the price due to increased demand straining resources. It would be more odd if it didn't come down after a time with that justification.

[-] draughtcyclist@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Increased demand would bring increased revenue to cover increased resources, no?

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

increased resources

Hah, good one.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Generally governments don't work on such a simple profit model. Especially not when activity in one sector (removing citizenship) damages activity in another (collecting taxes).

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

TBF, dissuading most citizens from it probably should be a goal to avoid capital flight.

The problem comes from edge cases where a "citizen" has never lived on American soil and doesn't intend to act on their entitlement to US citizenship.

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
66 points (97.1% liked)

News

37859 readers
787 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS