460
Elon Musk's Twitter takeover being probed by SEC
(www.reuters.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
460 points (95.8% liked)
News
23282 readers
3834 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Couldn't be happening to a more deserving guy. Between the racism lawsuits, his ex-girlfriend lawsuit, investor lawsuits, former executive suing him, and now the SEC? I hope this is the year we take all of Elon's money.
Just shows how weak our government is against the rich. If the SEC order any of us to appear we would appear or go to jail. These fucker can even ignore subpoena.
They couldn't even enforce their settlement with him over the fraud he was investigated for at Tesla. Which doesn't even count all the fraud they turned a blind eye to.
Cause the SEC is a civil enforcement group.
They can't arrest you
I'm extremely aware of what the SEC is. They explicitly chose not to go back to court when Musk refused to abide by the terms of the agreement that was further clarified by the court after he refused to abide by the settlement terms initially.
Having to type a whole extra paragraph just to make pedants happy makes the internet suck.
How extremely, exactly?
Less than Musk, but enough to not need it explained. I've done IT consulting work for a company that was being investigated.
This is as far as I feel comfortable going tonight.
i.e., excessive wealth deferment
All of this could be why he’s slowly morphing into Kathy Bates, he’s looking for a disguise we might trust.
I know a guy whose ankles would disagree strongly with that assesment
The only hypothesis that makes sense so far, IMO.
Maybe he and Trump can share a cell together.
Even if we could just take away 99.9999%, that would be nice. He'd still be several times wealither than the average american his age.
That's acceptable to me, look what he pisses his money away on. The other .0001% would be gone quickly.
As much as I would love for that to happen, money just gets shuffled around between companies and people like cards at a casino. It's exceptionally easy to launder it when you're that wealthy.
And then even if you do somehow manage to remove all his assets, he still maintains his existing social networks and connections, which may be enough to get him back to a similar position.
Prison is necessary if he has committed financial crimes. Anything less is merely finger-wagging.
Yeah, I mean, none of us are that lucky. But is a life without dreaming a life worth living?
It's the wrong day for me to answer that question too honestly, but I understand your point. Keep on dreaming and living the dream, friend.
musk reportedly burns a lot of bridges (you have to in order to get that filthy rich)