212

Wendy’s and McDonald’s have emerged victorious from a lawsuit that accused the fast food chains of false advertising.

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit brought against the two companies accusing them of selling smaller hamburgers than advertised and alleging the food didn’t look as appetizing in person as pictured on their websites.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 121 points 1 year ago

Only because 'everyone does it'

"US District Judge Hector Gonzalez ruled that Wendy’s and McDonald’s food images “are no different than other companies’ use of visually appealing images to foster positive associations with their products.”

Italics mine

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

Ahh yes the rarely used "jump off a bridge reversal" defense. If everyone jumped off a bridge would you do it too? Of course!

[-] zerofk@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

At the very least I’d start checking for a monster chasing them off the bridge.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

"Systemic problems are OK!"

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

Everyone does drugs, can we stop punishing people for it?

[-] sock@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

woah woah woah how would we enslave minorities if we decriminalized drugs

be a little more empathetic to slave owners (prisons and by proxy the politicians) please

[-] Pips@lemmy.film 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not really, that's a minor part of the opinion. The more important part is they tell you how much food you're going to get of what kind and then they give you that food. I don't think anyone would be able to win a case on "my burger didn't look like the burger in the ad" because every burger looks a little different. Lots of things that are the same don't look the same and let's not suddenly pretend we get McDonalds for the appearance. They'd win false advertising if, say, a quarter pounder was only 2 oz.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Lots of things that are the same don’t look the same

...and that's false advertising, that's the point of the lawsuit.

[-] sock@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

yeah this lawsuit is stupid and anyone who thinks McDonald's would lose is also stupid

have we forgotten what advertising is? its idealized, its artificial, its eye-catching. thats the point. like the suit says everyone does it, thats just good marketing.

frankly i think it makes commericals a bit more tolerable if theyre at least aesthetically pleasing. but marketers marketing in a system that requires advertising for anyone to be relevant cannot be infringed on for just two companies doing the marketing the exact same. blame capitalism for ads not the companies.

(unless we're taking excessive ads on websites or whatever then blame the sites they're just greedy)

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

like the suit says everyone does it

And they should not be allowed to.

[-] sock@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

what is the line then

how bout this. we ban ALL film. cameras are no longer allowed and any sort of media should be burned as its all idealized and any picture of anything wont look like a picture of something else therefore all media should be banned due to false advertising.

wait that doesnt make any sense. youre not gonna take a shitty video of yourself and post it online youre gonna take a bunch of attempts so it looks better than you actually are. that's marketing its no different that a company is doing it. therefore if you want to be angry at a company "false advertising" then be mad at every picture in existence too.

try to at least be consistent with your cynicism. dont judge others based on their actions if youre gonna judge yourself only based on your circumstance.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

wait that doesnt make any sense.

Well you at least said one sane thing in that rambling cacophony

[-] sock@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

lol so u dont have any idea and ur just yapping got it

[-] quindraco@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

If you replace your underscores with asterisks, emphasis/italics should work as intended.

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I am posting this from Voyager, does it not look correct? I did not underscore anything and added the italics for his quote.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Nothing in your comment is italicized in Sync.

Does this line show up in italics for you?

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago
[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

GTK..

Lemmy is weird

😂

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting, I do not see the underscores in Voyager.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting indeed

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

This comment is in italics on Voyager

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Holy shit... That's me making italics with underscores instead of asterisks...

And it shows up right for me in Sync.,

Shit is weird

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It looks fine on Boost for Lemmy

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
212 points (95.7% liked)

News

23301 readers
1171 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS