28
submitted 1 year ago by tintory@lemm.ee to c/politics@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tintory@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

https://x.com/CACommonGround/status/1710751960381657179?s=20

Common Ground have thoughts on that

"The veto of #AB309 – revenue neutral cost rental social housing on public land which could be built starting next year – while we only commit to study the issue for another 2-3 years is an insult to the millions of housing cost-burdened residents of California."

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 year ago

How is the governor’s office claiming this will cost hundreds of millions while common ground and other proponents describe it as revenue-neutral? Which is it?

[-] pbjamm@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Revenue neutral usually means they project it to be neutral over their chosen time and based on their assumptions. It is for sure not free up front and that is money the government has to spend. It MAY eventually be cost neutral, but there is no guarantee it will nor when that will be.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks. With that in mind, while this seems like a great program, I can understand the governor’s perspective. For better or worse CA is required to maintain a balanced budget so these expenses must be considered.

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
28 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10179 readers
88 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS