359
submitted 1 year ago by snek@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Highlight:

“I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel, everything is closed,” Gallant said. “We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] newDayRocks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

You know what. Sure. I think Israel will go for this.

Release of all illegally detained Palestinians.

In return, Israel gets

  • safe return of all hostages taken
  • complete surrender of all Hamas leadership
  • complete surrender and custody of all Palestinian combatants
  • including anyone who conspired or otherwise assisted in the recent act of terrorism
[-] snek@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Feels to me like that wouldn't work on Hamas' side. Another situation where Israel is the total winner.

[-] newDayRocks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well since Hamas has already executed civilians, and Israel has both the military advantage and support of world leaders, they are not exactly negotiating from a position of strength.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think your plan would even remotely lead to a joint country solution, more like Israel just wins.

[-] newDayRocks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I didn't suggest any plan leading to a joint county solution.

You know what would not even remotely lead to such a solution? Kidnapping and murdering civilians.

Just so we're clear, everyone loses here. But Israel is not going to negotiate with terrorists, nor should they.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah sorry I mixed up the threads. In another one, I was asking people what they would do if they were Hamas to reach a joint state solution. My bad.

You know what would not even remotely lead to such a solution? Kidnapping and murdering civilians.

I agree. Hamas are dumb as fuck.

Just so we’re clear, everyone loses here. But Israel is not going to negotiate with terrorists, nor should they.

And Israel won't care about civilian lives either. Not wanting to negotiate with terrorists doesn't mean all those kids in Gaza had to die. This is not what "not negotiating with terrorists" looks like. What it looks like is wanting to ethnically cleanse Palestinians.

In your example above, Israel takes all while Palestinians just get "prisoners" back (prisoners that are not really being tried for anything, a literal war crime, so for all intents and purposes they are not detained under any reasonable law and they don't have the most basic of rights)... and Palestine gets nothing.

Seems to me like maybe Israel should negotiate with terrorists if it means less dead civilians. But Israel doesn't care about that. And this is why we are here today.

[-] newDayRocks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In your example above, Israel takes all while Palestinians just get "prisoners" back (prisoners that are not really being tried for anything, a literal war crime, so for all intents and purposes they are not detained under any reasonable law and they don't have the most basic of rights)... and Palestine gets nothing.

Palestine also get the benefit of not having their cities ravaged while Israel troops hunt down enemy combatants. They get to keep some semblance of an autonomous nation. They also minimize civilian casualties in their end, if they actually cared about that.

Seems to me like maybe Israel should negotiate with terrorists if it means less dead civilians. But Israel doesn't care about that. And this is why we are here today.

It's very hard to make the argument that Israel should care about less dead civilians when the other side specifically targets civilians. I'm not sure why you keep expecting Israel to negotiate with restraint when they have no incentive to negotiate at all.

What will happen if Israel does not come to the table? Hamas will kill innocent people? And if Israel negotiates and comes to peace with Hamas, the killing will stop? History shows otherwise.

And since that killing innocent part already happens, there's nothing left to bargain for is there?

I also take issue with the fact that bringing accountability to Hamas for what happened is considered one sided negotiations for Israel. How is justice for a terrorist act considered a total victory?

[-] snek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Palestine also get the benefit of not having their cities ravaged while Israel troops hunt down enemy combatants.

This should never be a "benefit" nor is it a "benefit" to any other group of people.

They get to keep some semblance of an autonomous nation.

Yeah just a "fake" self determination, never a real fulfilling one.

hey also minimize civilian casualties in their end, if they actually cared about that.

If they actually cared about that? What is that supposed to mean? Sounds to me like you are making shitty generalizations about Palestinians.

I’m not sure why you keep expecting Israel to negotiate with restraint when they have no incentive to negotiate at all. I don't expect them to. I have no hope at all that the current Israeli government will stop committing war crimes.

[-] newDayRocks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

This should never be a "benefit" nor is it a "benefit" to any other group of people.

Then don't harbor terrorists. It obviously wasn't a "benefit" to the Israelis who were murdered now was it?

If they actually cared about that? What is that supposed to mean? Sounds to me like you are making shitty generalizations about Palestinians.

If Hamas cared about civilian casualties, they would never have kidnapped and executed civilians. If they cared about civilian casualties, they would negotiate their surrender.

If you're trying to spotlight Israel's treatment of Palestinians and hoping to garner sympathy, you're not going to have much success when the current world event topic is "Palestinians (Hamas) murdered and taken hostage innocent Israeli civilians."

[-] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You're right in your last statement. The world has already ignored Palestinian suffering and the result now is an ongoing ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. Nope, no one would sanction Israel or do anything and here we are today.

[-] newDayRocks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ignoring the false statements you are making. If you want the world to support you, don't commit acts of terror on civilians.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you want the world to support you, don’t commit acts of terror on civilians.

Are you talking about Palestinians or about Hamas? Because Hamas coming "acts of terror" is not justified, and neither is Israel's acts of terror which it commits daily and without anyone giving a fuck.

[-] newDayRocks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The world will continue to side with the group that isn't hunting down innocent people in their homes and at festivals.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The problem with what you're saying is that Israel commits war crimes every day. So why should the world side with them?

[-] newDayRocks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The problem is pro-Palestinian side trying to claim that illegal detention and collateral damage from war is equal to terrorist operations that intentionally targeted massacres of civilians.

That doesn't work for anyone with a sense of nuance and common sense.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think you only applied your own logic to Israel and not Palestinians.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The world will continue to side with the group that is ethnically cleansing Palestinians*

There I corrected it for you.

[-] newDayRocks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Whatever helps you sleep at night.

[-] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Israel has executed their own disproportionally large share of civilians today.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
359 points (95.9% liked)

News

23284 readers
1954 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS