1209
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah but a lot were also bad which is why it’s stupid when people act like the opinions of the founding fathers should matter more than the opinions of contemporary Americans when the same founding fathers were smart enough to realize the constitution should be a living document and not a holy totem to use as a club to stifle any progress.

[-] Gigan@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I think there were only a couple bad ideas, which have been mostly fixed by amendments. It is a living document, it has changed over time. You could argue that it should be easier to change, but there would be consequences for that too.

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

I think we can find a middleground between "fuck em" and "their word is law"

In fact most of the time the people trying to make their word out to be law are using the most loose and self-pandering interpretation they can.

Like you said, the same founding fathers did not want it to be this way. I wish we'd argue harder how unamerican it is that people are treating the founding fathers with zealotry.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

They literally designed the Constitution to be the foundation of all law in the country.

Their words (at least the specific ones in the Constitution) literally are law.

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, the ones specific to the constitution

Because those words can be changed. They were made to be changed. They were intended to be changed.

They're not meant to be worshipped, they're meant to do their job, and change as needed to keep up with the times.

The founding fathers had their fears, and the constitution was made to repel those fears. And little by little we use their name to draw those fears side by side what they created.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

They’re not meant to be worshipped

I think the central problem here is a lot of kids conflating "this is literally the ultimate law of the land" with "I have a religious reverence for this document".

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Fine. If you can get agreement across the states as to which of those ideas are bad - you can amend them away.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

I know, but my point is that the founding fathers acknowledged they weren’t infallible which makes appeals to tradition and authority that many use to prevent progress in the US are extra dumb.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

...which has nothing to do with the Constitution.

Unless the appeal to authority is a literal appeal to literal legal authority.

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

...But it does have to do with what NOT_RICK was discussing prior to that post, which had to do with the constitution.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Not really. Apparently, some people are acting like idiots because they think the founding fathers would have thought a certain way. Sure, okay, sounds like a problem.

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Not a problem.

Two separate things only conflated by the uneducated.

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Okay well, you sound uneducated to me. And since you can't finish a single...single post in this entire thread without insulting people, I don't see any point to arguing here.

Just...be mad I guess. Just try not to think you sound as smart or as mature as you think you do.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Just…be mad I guess.

On it

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1209 points (90.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

11028 readers
226 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS