769
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A federal judge on Monday issued a gag order on former President Donald Trump, limiting what he can say about special counsel Jack Smith’s federal prosecution into his alleged attempt to subvert in the 2020 presidential election.

The order restricts Trump’s ability to publicly target court personnel, potential witnesses, or the special counsel and his staff. The order did not impose restrictions on disparaging comments about Washington, DC, – where the jury will take place – or certain comments about the Justice Department at large, both of which the government requested.

“This is not about whether I like the language Mr. Trump uses,” Judge Tanya Chutkan said. “This is about language that presents a danger to the administration of justice.”

“His presidential candidacy does not give him carte blanche to vilify public servants who are simply doing their jobs,” the judge added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 199 points 1 year ago

And the consequences when he breaks this order less than 24 hours from now?

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 106 points 1 year ago

Fucking right?! Can we just lock him up just this once? I'm sick of him dominanting the discourse. I just want universal healthcare/ basic income.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 1 year ago

You just want things that our current overlords will never give us. Don’t worry, I’m on your side. We’ll get there, eventually.

Vote.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Better happen sooner then later. America is just asking for a John Q moment.

[-] Z3k3@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Can you indulge a non American idiot. What's a John q moment. All I'm finding when searching is a denzel Washington movie with the synopsis not giving quite enough context to fit

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's essentially what took place in that movie. Health care wouldn't cover a life saving procedure for Denzel Washington's character's child. So he held up the hospital until his child got care. I honestly forgot how it ended. But if I had to guess he gets shot and his kid gets to live.

Edit:

John is ultimately acquitted of attempted murder and armed criminal action, but convicted of kidnapping and false imprisonment. His lawyer assures him that he will likely serve no more than two years. As John is escorted from the courthouse, Lester proclaims him as a hero, and a now-healthy Michael gains eye contact with his father, saying "Dad!" and then, "Thank you".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Q.#:~:text=John%20is%20ultimately%20acquitted%20of,of%20kidnapping%20and%20false%20imprisonment.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I honestly think there's going to be a mass shooting at an insurance or pharmaceutical company. Someone's eventually going to go after a CEO out of spite

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They may provide us with tasty cutlets though.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For some reason no media seem to have linked to a copy of the gag order, but prior reporting suggests that the judge's threat if Trump violates the order is to do one thing he really doesn't want the court to do, which is move up the trial date.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Which is a quite reasonable move.

"Dude continues with his threats? Alright, let's get this over with. And add his threats to the pile of evidence."

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The theory is hey, if he's going to keep trying to tamper with witnesses and jurors, were going to expedite the trial to minimize his opportunity.

Probably along with fines.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the consequences when he breaks this order

Probably another huge influx of campaign cash.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[-] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Peek*

Unless you can show me a stealthy mountain

[-] President_Pyrus@feddit.dk 3 points 1 year ago

Gregor Clegane definitely isn't.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mt Rainier

Stealthiest mountain I ever seen

"oooh are ya gonna see me today? Maybe, maybe not"

Edit: misspelled

[-] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Rainier? 😅🤦🏼‍♂️

The irony is thick in this one.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oops

My family is from Seattle, they would be ashamed

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

It is so stealthy, people don't even know the name correctly.

Looking at you, Mr James Bond...

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Lets hope for the best. Don't they have these solitary confinement cells that are painted in pink floor to ceiling?

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[-] tsz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I'm going to go with a double-serious rebuke.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Supposedly having the trial sooner.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

"That were three more violations in yesterdays speech, so we will move the trial back another three weeks. See you in court next Tuesday, Mr. Trump."

[-] crawley@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They'll issue another gag order...

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Same thought here.

This ultimately means nothing if he doesn’t face any consequences for breaking the court order.

[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

It's been widely reported that she will move up the trial date which is the last thing he wants since his strategy is to delay until after the election at which time, if he wins, none of this will matter. The theory is that doing so gives him less time to intimidate witnesses and officers of the courts.

[-] uphillbothways@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not a lawyer, but that should be felony contempt for violating a direct court order.

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think for people with a reputation for not paying bills, this kind of thing should be held as a deposit.

Just so they can't delay paying it for years.

It's just gone the moment the judge decides it, and he has to appeal it back

I mean, it's an awful precent for everyone else, but for him and Rudy and Alex Jones there's really no other way to get the cash out of them.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
769 points (98.0% liked)

News

23409 readers
1991 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS