195
submitted 1 year ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/europe@feddit.de
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nakal@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Is this something like "Na is toxic. Cl is toxic. NaCl is tasty."?

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

It's more things that the US would call "Generally Recognised As Safe" or GRAS. Stuff that was tested in the 70s and written off as fine, in spite of the fact that it does have some negative effects. Typically the effects don't occur immediately in small doses, only very large doses, however at the time there was no real study done on the effects of continuous low doses over a long period. More recent research has determined that they are in fact harmful in this way.

However, getting businesses to change is hard, because money, and it sounds like they've managed to get the EU to back off. Shame.

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It also could be something along the lines of how lead is toxic, but is useful in electronics. Therefore, it makes more sense to tell people to not eat their computer than it does to ban lead.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

They are perfectly able to make that distinction. It is about products, where normal use and disposal can lead (haha) to exposure.

[-] letmesleep@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Well, we did ban lead in computers in the EU nearly a decade. Afaik it's not much of a problem for industrial processes because those can control solder temperatures precisely. For private usage you still can buy solder with lead.

That said, I do agree with you that there needs to be a distinction regarding how likely the PFAs are to actually end up in someone's body. Not just based on the type of product but also based on the buyers. Professional equipment sold in specialized stores may be much more dangerous than stuff you can get in the supermarket.

[-] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Unrelated but you just reminded me of CJ from The West Wing:

I've been seated next to a chemist tonight.

23 Nobel winners, I couldn't get literature or peace or something?

They speak in letters that don't spell anything but end up meaning table salt.

[-] letmesleep@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

NaCl is "toxic". Salt (mostly the sodium/Na in it) is linked to quite a few health issues.

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/salt-and-sodium/

That's the issue here: It's always the dosage that makes the poison.

[-] nakal@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hmm.. it is probably not toxic in traditional sense. Otherwise everything can be dangerous, even water.

Also some people noted that general products are in focus here, not only food. This is a subtle but huge difference.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
195 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8326 readers
2 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS