189

What alternate Youtube frontends are there? And which ones do you recommend? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 1 year ago by moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

90 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've heard of piped due to the piped-link bot, but I am curious about others.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With some tools open source has many advantages, with others it's mostly about transparency. IMHO this case is the latter case. You won't gain much by being able to fork it. I don't like it when people criticize projects only because those don't align with their personal philosophy. Don't use it if you don't like it but there's really no good reason for others to avoid it.

[-] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

All people have their priorities. For most people on this community it's probably being free of cost but for some freedom is also important.

I also don't recommend against using software that's not perfect according to my personal philosophy, but I think it's important to point out any advantages and disadvanages so that anyone can decide for themselves. As I said, most people on here won't care about the difference between source available and open source.

it's mostly about transparency

Good point. If they'd use the term source available I'd have nothing to say. The reason I'm so pedantic is because increasingly businesses try to gain good publicity by calling their software open source while using Business Source License and similar, which are source available licenses.

I'll definitly follow this project and look where it's going.