307
JK Rowling prefers two years in jail over using correct pronouns
(www.thepinknews.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
307 points (86.5% liked)
United Kingdom
4110 readers
123 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What even IS the importance of sex?
Women bear children, so are materially disadvantaged when it comes to sex. They can be raped and get pregnant as a result. This can't happen to men. This is compounded by sexual dimorphism meaning women are weaker on average, though the tails definitely overlap.
This means special laws are needed to protect women wherever sexual dimorphism has the potential to disempower - for example, the right to safe abortions, certain economic protections for mothers, and perhaps even some protected spaces.
I don't have the answers, but that's the basis of the argument. We've come so far in the West it's hard to see the material inequality written into our DNA. With modern contraception it can be especially hard to recognise the reality of our bodies, and certainly natural to resent it.
Don't men have worse health problems including higher infant mortality rate? Do you think we should be legislating to even the playing ground in that aspect?
In an ideal world, yes.
How?
Just because some people are at an apparent genetic disadvantage, does not follow that we should attempt to legally remove inequities.
This would both be unfair to those considered advantaged in some way, and impossible to implement.
Alright mate.