189
Elon Musk blames remote workers for Tesla's struggling car sales
(www.capjournal.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
189 points (64.9% liked)
Technology
59038 readers
3147 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm totally with you on the charging (and don't have one myself) but as for the drivetrain, is one really that much more efficient than another? There's not a lot of energy lost to heat, noise, and whatever else that ICEs have. Most of it is in (for example) the body's aerodynamics, no? And as far as how long they last, most of them are about 10 years old, tops? Hard to judge that one just yet (yeah, the Leafs suck already but they don't have a battery management system)
There are a lot of variables that affect it, but Tesla do extremely well here with things like the octovalve and heat scavenging for their AC system. Combine this with the relatively high fast charging speed means range gets added back quickly. About the only company that's competitive in terms of efficiency and charging speed is Hyundai/Kia at the moment.
You can compare similar cars here. For example:
Sedans: Tesla Model 3 RWD: 137 Wh/km Hyundai Ioniq 6: 148 Wh/km Polestar 2 SR: 172 Wh/km VW ID.3: 166 Wh/km BMW i4: 156 Wh/km
SUV: Telsa Model Y RWD: 164 Wh/km Hyundai Ioniq 5: 183 Wh/km VW ID.4: 177 Wh/km BMW iX3: 192 Wh/km BYD Atto3: 183 Wh/km