483
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Salamendacious@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

After Boebert’s Beetlejuice embarrassment, Adam Frisch hopes he can wrestle the Colorado congresswoman’s seat from her

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maeve@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

His platform is very lackluster. He’s basically running on not being her. :-/

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Interesting … because let’s be honest, that’s pretty much enough reason for most people to vote for him

[-] jmd_akbar@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

But you're talking sense... Not 'Murrican...

😜

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Would it be “talking sense” if he were for dropping a nuke somewhere?

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

You have a point.

[-] n0m4n@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

When your opponent is making a series of bad decisions, that is enough. People really are sick and tired of the blatant BS.

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

There's a whole page of his views and plans for different issues here https://adamforcolorado.com/issues/

[-] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

How very dare you brings facts to this discussion!

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
[-] jhymesba@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I'm reading the document provided by killeeronthecorner. This is what I see:

  • He will fight for Western Colorado water rights.
  • He will push for an 'all of the above' energy plan which likely includes solar, wind, hydro, nuclear, and petrochemical.
  • He will push for farmer-friendly policies, which ties to the above plus opposing 'bad' regulations and opening markets.
  • He will take actions in support of small businesses.
  • Opposing 'bad' regulations, again.
  • Job Training.
  • Upgrade (presumably power and internet) infrastructure
  • He will tackle inflation (albeit without a good plan on how to deal with the current causes of inflation...)
  • He is pro-choice.
  • He is pro-environmentalism.

He's definitely a blue-dog Democrat, more conservative than I'd like, but this is CO-03 we're talking about. You're NOT going to get a progressive firebrand to represent that district. You're going to get somebody who is on the Conservative end of the spectrum. Getting a Pro-Choice Moderate Democrat who is in any way open to Green policies in the district that includes Farmers and Oil Men and places like Rifle would be a godsend, considering the person who CURRENTLY represents CO-03 is rabidly anti-choice and quite interested in pushing radical MAGA policies. You get what you can take out of a place like CO-03.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, I think we’re too late to prevent global environmental catastrophe, but we should try hard. Otoh, I understand you.

[-] DiatomeceousGirth@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

He's a former banker who lives in Aspen. Of course he has no strong opinions other than maintain status quo.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

The sword of truth, at last! Thank you.

[-] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

I've looked at the republican candidates in my local elections the last few years and that's pretty much the entirety of their platforms. Most of their websites literally listed zero platform at all, it's annoying as hell

[-] HerrLewakaas@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

For me personally that would suffice lol. It doesn't get much worse than Bobert

[-] Llamalitmus@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

If there is anything the last 3 years has taught me, it can always get worse.

[-] rthmchgs@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago

It's just about good enough for me, but I don't live there.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And they thought MAD was a good* deterrent. :-/

Edited word

[-] neptune@dmv.social 2 points 1 year ago

The election is a year away. And why make an unforced error?

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
483 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2090 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS