666
submitted 11 months ago by tsz@lemmy.world to c/sysadmin@lemmy.world

I'm so absolutely sick of it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grue@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago

You're confusing copyright law with property law. Sure, you can't make and sell copies (fun fact: you can make copies for certain other purposes, though), but that's not a limitation on what you can do with your own copy, which is your property.

Ownership of the right to copy and ownership of the copy itself are entirely different things.

[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

I'm not confusing copyright law and property law, but you are deliberately conflating them so you can say things like "That's what the copyright cartel claims, but it's a goddamn lie." in response to someone saying that owning a copy of something does not give you the rights to that thing.

[-] grue@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago

The copyright cartel claims you don't own your copy. That's a lie: you do own your copy. Owning a copy of something does, in fact, give you all the rights to that copy, so claiming it doesn't is wrong.

[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Nobody here is debating if you own the physical copy or not. You're debating the difference between owning a copy and having the rights to it.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
666 points (97.2% liked)

Sysadmin

7542 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS