674
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

I totally agree. There's no reason anyone needs to consistently purchase breakfast and lunch if they work in an office.

If you don't do it at home, why would you do it at the office?

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

You can make food at home as a part of your lunch break. If you make food and bring it in, you need to spend extra non paid time to do that.

[-] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's fair to say for lunch. Not for breakfast though, unless one makes the argument there should also be a breakfast break.

Regardless, with the existing status quo it's not a good financial decision to eat out for breakfast and lunch everyday.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The status quo shouldn't mean that you are forced to spend time outside of work time preparing for work time. Unless they want to pay for that time, or your lunch.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Because I don't have a commute at home so there's time to make breakfast and lunch.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Work pays well enough for meals, then it's a non-issue.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
674 points (99.1% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
92 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS