536
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 144 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Still waiting for the good guy with a gun they keep repeating

EDIT: OK everyone, yes he was the good guy with a gun. Thanks to everyone for pointing this out

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 116 points 1 year ago

Apparently, the shooter was a firearms instructor. Aka, good guy with a gun turned bad guy with a gun.

This crap will never end until the tools they use to kill are off the streets.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago

Apparently, the shooter was a firearms instructor.

Every gun owner thinks they're a responsible gun owner.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Probably a "Look down the barrel to make sure there is no bullet in there" type.

[-] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not my shocked face!!

...Support for Trump, among other politicians. As shown by the video, Card liked tweets from high-profile conservative figures such as Donald Trump Jnr., Tucker Carlson, Dinesh D'Souza. He also engaged with publications from former house speakers Kevin McCarthy and Jim Jordan, as per the video.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I think that's the same error in judgement that leads the vast majority of motorists to believe their driving skills are above average. Forgot what it's called.

[-] variaatio@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which is the key problem. Everyone is a "responsible gun owner" and "good guy with a gun"...... until sometimes they suddenly aren't anymore. At which point your protection is what was person able to keep under normal circumstances aka what they had in their possession on the moment they had a mental snap.

Was it a semi-auto shoot as fast as your finger pulls rifle with potentially hundreds of rounds in quick swap magazines or do they have a manual action hunting rifle or shotgun with fixed magazine, that need to be manually reloaded.

Do they have a pistol with again potentially hundreds of rounds of quick reload ammunition or don't or maybe a target pistol with fixed magazine.

That is why places around the world have magazine and type restrictions, since they exactly know "checking backgrounds isn't fool proof and now amount of background checking helps again sudden newly emerging situation after the checks have been done".

Sure that 5 round moose hunting rifle will absolutely wreck say those 5 people, but one can't exactly run amock shooting around endlessly with moose rifle. Damage limitation. 5 dead people is better situation, than 22 dead people. As cold calculating as that is.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Everyone is a “responsible gun owner” and “good guy with a gun”… until sometimes they suddenly aren’t anymore.

Yeah, and unpopular opinion likely but I think of this similarly to dogs turning on their owners.

And similarly I'd rather have a Yorkshire terrier go crazy on me than a Pitbull.

[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

cough cough Uvalde cough

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

didn't come because his mother aborted him /s

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Yesterday the right said this WAS a good guy. Just let that sink in.

[-] UnspecificGravity@lemmings.world 15 points 1 year ago

This guy is exactly the kind of person that the GOP considers a "good guy with a gun". He is a mentally ill veteran firearms instructor. Sounds like a boilerplate Trump supporter. Exactly who they want to have more guns.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's even worse, GOP would want this guy to be an elementary school teacher as a "solution" to the school shootings. Broken, selfish, heartless cowards

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Army vet and gun instructor... This was the good guy

[-] Polar@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

There was a study published from data from the last like.. 10 years, I believe, that show that people with guns are more likely to run away, and people WITHOUT guns, are more likely to jump in and try to stop the shooter.

So ya. These good guys with guns are just pussies that never actually use them for good.

[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Well yeah if they weren't such gigantic cowards they wouldn't buy guns.

[-] Polar@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Ya. I live in Canada, and I've never felt the need to own a gun. We have a TON of hunting guns here, but I think the fact we don't allow open carry, changes the thought process of gun owners here, and we don't see them as weapons to point at other people. They are more so seen as a tool for a hobby, like a fishing rod is used for fishing.

And honestly, if you avoid Toronto, violence in general is really low. Toronto is just.. special.

[-] piradianssquared@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

And honestly, if you avoid Toronto, violence in general is really low. Toronto is just… special.

Toronto isn't even in the top ten most dangerous...

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That might be because people who own guns have had training in how not to get killed.

I'm not sure that saying gun owners should be quicker to shoot people is the right direction.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The real question is, of those ≈35 cases where an armed civilian stopped a shooter, how many did the cops then shoot the "good guy with a gun?" I know it's happened, and I think at least twice.

Also 35/thousands is a rounding error.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_United_States

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

Mass shootings themselves are a rounding number, rounding numbers are what we're discussing. Also helps that they almost always choose gun free zones "for no reason" instead of "gun guaranteed zones." Almost like they don't want armed people shooting at them.

And one or two, but just because the cops make an error, doesn't mean the person was wrong to save all those people. That's also why you're told to put the gun away once you've secured the situation, and you're supposed to give a visual description of the shooter when you call it in. You really think it's better to just let people cause whatever harm they want to than for them to stop the violent attacker? Even if it's just a guy with a knife who can "only kill less people than a guy with a gun," "if it even stops just one" right?

load more comments (41 replies)
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
536 points (96.9% liked)

News

23406 readers
1638 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS