83
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Matomo@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago
[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It considers CIA propaganda fronts legitimate sources and in general questionable sources, like random articles from businessinsider dot com, are accepted as citations when the article is about something international-community-1international-community-2 considers ”bad”. It's also known that the US government is involved in heavy astroturfing. We don't call it NATOpedia for nothing.

[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When it comes to heated political topics it is not very impartial, due to the opinions of the powerusers.

I agree that for a lot of stuff it is very useful, but still.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
83 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23313 readers
132 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS