1073
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SchizoDenji@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pro wrestling wiki pages used to have entrance themes, finishers and signature moves in the wrestler's page.

One power-mod removed it and it's gone.

People suck wiki's cock on the Internet, but it's a pretty dogshit site and I wish it dies so that a new and better alternative pops up.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago

I think assuming a better alternative will appear is a bad idea. Most likely some company sees an opening to control the information and monetize it. They can't really now because Wikipedia is the default, but I don't doubt someone would try if they see the hold Wikipedia has falter.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago

It doesn't need to die for a new alternative to pop up.

I just doubt any alternative will be as good as the one we have now.

[-] SchizoDenji@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

There will always be someone there to take its place. Maybe a more transparent and decentralised alternative like how fan-wikis used to be before Fandom bough them.

[-] Vespair@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Tbh those pieces of trivia don't feel like encyclopedic information in the first place. A reader need not know specific intro songs to have an encyclopedic overview of wrestling, just that intro songs are often used.

A list containing the specific intro songs is vastly more suited for a fandom repository than an encyclopedia.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

I have to disagree. Wrestling is all about the show, so a dedicated table of wrestlers' entrance themes, finishers and signature moves seems very on-brand for Wikipedia. It's also unclear if this was just a line item listed on every wrestlers' individual page or if this was a table, but either seems pretty on brand. Maybe there's a dedicated page for entrance theme music and a table of who used what song makes sense there?

To reference something I actually know about almost every Wikipedia page for a railroad will include a detailed route map. One could argue that that's not encyclopedia-like and should be reserved for a travel site or train chasing guide yet here we are

[-] daltotron@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That sucks, but I also kind of empathize with wiki mods, cause it's really hard to know when to cut stuff down. I remember seeing a while back a bunch of people that migrated out from wikipedia to some completely unknown new wiki nobody will ever hear about, because they were working on chronicling all the roads in america with screenshots and notes of location and historical details about it all. Wikipedia didn't really get it, as it's more like a kind of academic and news aggregate, and there was nothing really there to aggregate, it was just an infodump of a bunch of different stuff. If wikipedia was a 1-1 map of the world, then it would be the size of the world. Or bigger, if you include historical stuff. No way you're fitting all that on a 102 gig drive, or whatever the size of wikipedia is. Plus there's hosting costs to consider, so it's not like they could do that even if they really wanted.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1073 points (90.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

29816 readers
110 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS