submitted 10 months ago by Harry_h0udini@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/foss@beehaw.org

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Skelectus@suppo.fi 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's not foss, unless they've changed the 'temporary licence' yet.

E: It is an awesome project and I really hope it takes off, but this isn't the best place to post it.

[-] Harry_h0udini@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

It's free and the code is available for inspection.

[-] cacheson@kbin.social 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You're posting to /c/foss, not /c/freeofchargeandthecodeisavailableforinspection.

[-] Skelectus@suppo.fi 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

People with different definitions were constantly bickering on whether it qualifies as open source. It might as well for all I care.

But it's not free and open source with that restrictive license. The word free doesn't refer to the price tag.

[-] tracteurblinde@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023

9 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17550 readers

13 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS