662
submitted 1 year ago by gkd@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] konalt@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago

It's not serverless, it's just someone else's server

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

Yeah, yeah, but I don't have to patch it.

[-] physcx@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Don’t have to patch the host at least… I think we have a 6 week sla for certain compliances to ensure we are patching our containers, code, and deps regularly.

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

That sounds like a problem for IT, not a dev. ;)

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Exactly, it is as much serverless as the offering that allowed to host php sites back in the day.

[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Serverless is more associated with micro services where each micro service can scale independently from each other.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It is, but the idea how it works is roughly the same.

[-] Cryan24@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That you don't need to care about.. as a dev you want to write your code, deploy and not have to care about the underlying server maintenance.. you are paying for that to be someone else's problem.

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
662 points (97.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

32481 readers
233 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS