view the rest of the comments
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
"As much as our dark roast coffee" isn't an absolute value, but I think there really should be a sticker saying "Warning: high caffeine content / approx (x mg small) (y mg med) (390mg large)". This sticker should appear clearly next to the menu items as well as on the cups. Self-serve stations should probably be removed since kids are vastly more likely to drink a ton of lemonade compared to hot, black coffee.
I drank a few of these not sure if it was "as much as a regular coffee" or "as much as an equivalent size." I didn't think twice because I take a lot of caffeine anyway, but I shouldn't have had to google it.
I can see how depending on the circumstances of obtaining the drink, one might not know there is caffeine in it at all:
ordering from a third party online app that doesn't have all the right names, descriptions, and pictures
ordering through a third party proxy or having the item described to you by a third party ("anyone want anything? They have lemonade...")
There really should be a clear notice right on the thing you're about to drink from, of exactly how much caffeine is in it. No marketing crap ("it's charged!") or vague comparisons ("as much as our coffee") suffices.
How about a giant sign that says "390mg large" that everyone is just complaining that "how could she know that 390mg was too much"? Because it does actually have the number 390mg on the sign attached to the machine.
The funny thing in this case is that many people replying to this about what Panera should have done are naming things that Panera had already done in this case.
It does have 390mg large on the machines, but it's easy to miss. I do think it should be way bigger and have way more contrast, preferably a black/white standardized sticker. It doesn't have the mg amount on the cups, or if it does, it's really easy to miss.
I don't pour my drinks at 4' distance, and pictures at a closer range make the sign as obviously in-your-face as it looks in person (my experience). It's approximately the biggest, most blatant signs I've seen on a drink dispenser. Not to mention the massive underlined "caffeinated" on the well menu, and the giant floor signs in front of it advertising how caffeinated it is.
Per the sign: "30fl - 430cal - 390mg caffeine"
It does, and that is below the big ad-line about how it's "as much caffeine as our Dark Roast Coffee".
The real problem here is that they were REALLY pushing the caffeinated nature of the lemonade as a value-add, so it was (nearly?) impossible to miss. We don't know the poor girl missed that sign (as it's unlikely she did), and we can tell that fact because the family's lawyer is also already pushing a second argument that the "as much caffeine as our dark roast coffee" is misleading.
On the cups. The thing that people actually put up to their face and drink. There's a billion reasons why you wouldn't see the sign on the dispenser.
It's not even close to impossible to miss. It's really quite easy.
You mean the standard Panera cups that you use for everything from water to iced tea? Panera is self-serve.
So putting a caffeine warning on the cups used for water and sprite is the right answer, in your opinion? Maybe armed guards for every allergen scanning your wrist?
Agree to disagree. A reasonable person wouldn't miss it if they were paying attention. Do you have any severe food allergies? This really compares favorably to that because typically I get far less warning of an allergen in food than people get of beverages having a little caffeine in them. I don't get "warning contains lobster" on my food plates.
Yes. These ones. The ones for the charged lemonade.
This isn't a little caffeine, this is an uncomfortable amount of caffeine for most people who aren't regular coffee drinkers. Obviously a dangerous amount for people with heart conditions.
Interesting. A lot of Paneras use and advertise regular cups with this (just look at some marketing images to confirm). None o fmy local Paneras have them. I'm not sure there's a NEED to advertise it on a cup, but why not if it's custom I guess.
The FDA doesn't think so. But then, what is "Uncomfortable"? I can't handle the sugar in a can of Coca Cola. I want giant "fuckton of sugar" warnings. And water. If I drink more than 3 or 4 of my water bottle a day I can end up with real medical issues. Giant "don't drink to much water" signs on it?
The problem is that 400mg is not that much in the reality at the restaurant where it was purchased. It's a coffee and sandwich shop, and it's been known for bottomless coffee forever. Guess what happens if you get a bottomless large coffee and refill it just once? 800mg of caffeine baby.
It's literally up there with the most amount of caffeine you can get in one item from the restaurant.
Anyway, really boring argument.
That seems like an odd line. So this drink that's advertised as being just as caffeinated as coffee has a bit less caffeine than coffee. News at 11.
Agreed