739
submitted 1 year ago by sexy_peach@feddit.de to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But I honestly prefer the current version. It seems to have more green spaces.

Those "green spaces" are worthless freeway medians that do nothing but attract homeless camps. Here's a street view of some of it -- complete with panhandlers and tents in the background -- so you can see what I'm talking about.

Edit: LOL, nothing like downvoting a local for telling you the truth.

[-] Waker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

? I hadn't even read your comment until now.

I don't mind your guy's opinion at all, that was what I wanted to know when I left a comment. I even started by saying that I'm not even a local precisely because I wanted the locals opinions.

You all went out of your way to downvote me though, I'm not even quite sure why.

Also yeah, those underpasses look nasty af.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Apologies; my edit was directed at someone else, then.

Still, I think your comment earned its downvotes because suggesting the vast wasteland of parking lots and freeway medians has "potential" while calling the walkable, human-scale devlopment it replaced "claustrophobic" is... frankly, just objectively incorrect. I'm not sure you realize just how zoomed-out the view is, but for the record, those two prominent horizontal parallel roads (Memorial Dr and Fulton St) are about 1/4 mile (0.4km) apart. That means if you're trying to, say, walk from your house at the southeast corner of the image to the State Capitol just off the top of it, the majority of your journey is along a 5-lane stroad overpass above a busy freeway. It's among the least-pleasant pedestrian experiences one could imagine, short of not having a sidewalk at all.

[-] Waker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah I see what you mean. I had to go on street view to get it. I hadn't even realised that it was an overpass lol. Thought it was just a road but even so, it would be a boring walk.

With the old layout you'd have a more pleasant one through the neighbourhood and such.

Also about my initial comment, even though the parks looked claustrophobic to me, I said it was likely the black and white colors messing it up for me, and yeah we're zoomed out a lot. Also, parks are almost never claustrophobic anyways, I just meant how it looked from above I guess.

[-] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The homeless don't think those "green spaces" are worthless. Without them, where do you think they go? Just disappear??

[-] grue@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

You're not actually suggesting we should accept people living on freeway medians instead of building proper housing for them, are you?

[-] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, quite the opposite. Your choice of words...

that do nothing but attract homeless camps

...comes across as disgusted, as if we can't have the homeless out here visible. I'm all for helping them and have volunteered and donated accordingly, though I could do more.

A green, shaded spot to camp is a lot better than many homeless have it I'm afraid. Better than a freeway underpass if I had to choose personally.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Of course I don't want to see homeless people there, because I don't want there to be homeless people there. And you shouldn't either! WTF is wrong with you, that you want people to be homeless?!

[-] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Can you read? Of course I don't want people to be homeless, nor did I say anything to suggest that.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're the one advocating for them to be relegated to fucking freeway medians, not me!

I wanted the city to not close the Peachtree & Pine homeless shelter so that we wouldn't have this problem in the first place!

You should be fucking ashamed of yourself for dishonestly trying to shoot the messenger for the grievous sin of merely pointing out the goddamn problem!

[-] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Nothing I said suggests they should be relegated there. I do not believe they should be driven out when they have no place else to go. Too many places want to break up their camps without giving them any alternatives... making them miserable so they'll go elsewhere. I'm all for providing shelters and raising taxes to do it. As I said, I've volunteered working with the homeless many times when I used to work in and live near a downtown area. I hope to do more in the future though at the moment live a long ways away from an urban area to do so.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nothing I said suggests they should be relegated there.

Bullshit. When I implied that it was bad for them to be there (an idea that's nothing more than common fucking sense), you attacked me for it. You have been uncivil and accusatory to me from the very beginning. Again, WTF is your problem?

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
739 points (97.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9824 readers
3 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS