577

Mark your calendars

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I'm speaking more towards if workers stay at home en mass, etc.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Action and motion are necessary to sustain life in a community, through distribution, protection, and communication.

Nevertheless, whether workers are inside the home or outside, it seems reasonable to anticipate visitation by ACAB.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

it seems reasonable to anticipate visitation by ACAB.

I don't know, the optics of police literally going into people's homes and pulling them out and forcing them to work doesn't seem like something the government would want, no matter what.

[-] TehWorld@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Which side of government would care? The coproratocracy or the facists?

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Which side of government would care? The coproratocracy or the facists?

The side that wants to get reelected.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Not just the optics, but the very real danger to the police themselves. This is the US. People get shot for arguing. When you know that sometime this month the police will show up at your door, you might take precautions.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Optics? Seriously? Do we live on opposite sides of the television screen?

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

it seems reasonable to anticipate visitation by ACAB.

I don’t know, the optics of police literally going into people’s homes and pulling them out and forcing them to work doesn’t seem like something the government would want, no matter what.

Optics? Seriously? Do we live on opposite sides of the television screen?

You really think it would be a positive optic to see on the Evening News policeman going in the house and dragging people out and forcefully driving them to work and making them work at gunpoint?

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Do you need a definition of the word?

A quick Google search will get you that.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Now, returning, just for a moment, to the real world...

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

The World is what you make of it.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago
[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Listen, the system will not allow itself to collapse, instead of trying to preserve itself, simply due to a fear of outside judgment.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Listen, the system will not allow itself to collapse

Usually it gets to a point where collapse doesn't ask system for permission.

[-] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The collapse is the striking workers you believe are definitely safe from ACAB.

The system is ACAB.

Get it?

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Get it?

Yes, usually when my partner is in the mood.

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
577 points (99.0% liked)

Work Reform

11838 readers
4 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS