165

Capcom is worried that mods “offensive to public order and morals” will ‘tarnish’ the rep of their PC games (www.rockpapershotgun.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Goronmon@kbin.social to c/games@lemmy.world

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Zion@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What I AM saying is that the idea that sexuality is inherently more offensive than killing is straight up backwards to me. It's not even a capcom thing. That's just most societies, but Capcom is hitting a nerve with this

Exactly, it's ludicrous and always was. Especially in this day and age.

Mom/Dad: Billy what are you watching?
Billy: The Texas chainsaw massacre.
Mom/Dad: What happens in that?
Billy: People get hacked up with a chainsaw.
Mom/Dad: Oh, ok.

Later that day:

Mom/Dad: Billy what are you doing?
Billy: I'm playing Street fighter.
Mom/Dad: What's that?
Billy: It's a one on one fighting game.
Mom/Dad: Oh, that's nice... Wait a minute, IS THAT A PAIR OF BREASTS BILLY?!?!
Billy: yeah, I installed this mod and...
Mom/Dad: THAT'S IT! (Proceeds to confiscate the console)

As a parent myself, I understand not wanting to expose your kid to sexual content depending on their age, but in the context of sexual intercourse etc, not just a naked body.

[-] Cybersteel@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

I think the big difference is while violence is an expected part of life from wars and fights, sexual content is not.

[-] 9bananas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

sexual content

not an expected part of life

say that again, but very slowly...

alternatively I'd be thrilled to hear all about these alternative ways to have kids that you apparently think are out there...and then I'd like it explained to me how exactly that's not an "expected part of life"??