110

The two against and one abstention is very telling…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Patyk34@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 1 year ago

For which consecutive year has the UN overwhelmingly voted against the US embargo on Cuba now? 23rd?

[-] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 1 year ago

This happens every year and yet nothing is done about it. That veto power is amazing

[-] ComradeEd@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is the GA, no veto power there. It's just the entire UN going "this is against the UN charter, other resolutions of the UN, etc." and the U.S. going "ok"


단숨에

[-] SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Yeah I went back to read it, no veto. So that just confuses me more because what’s stopping the “international community” from enforcing anything to stop this damned embargo?

[-] Saeculum@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

International law is an anarchist system. If you possess enough power and social standing you can ignore and manipulate it without consequence

[-] Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago

One could argue that's how national law works too

[-] Saeculum@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

True, though not to the same extent.

[-] SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 1 year ago

Critical support for UN peacekeepers entering the U.S.

[-] ComradeEd@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The GA has no such power. It can discuss and recommend on a bunch of stuff, but can't enforce something like a blockade, anything that would effect things. The only body that can do that is the SC (and wouldn't you know it, that's where there is veto)


단숨에

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

It would have dissolved otherwise.

load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
110 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2304 readers
121 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS