126
submitted 1 year ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Quote: "We must teach Israel a lesson, and we will do it again and again. The Al-Aqsa Deluge [the name Hamas gave its 7 October onslaught - ed.] is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth. Will we have to pay a price? Yes, and we are ready to pay it. We are called a nation of martyrs, and we are proud to sacrifice martyrs."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Go to the Wikipedia, click on Reception, load the archived sources 40 thru 45 and then ask yourself how credible MEMRI is.

How Memri translates is here in the debate on source 45:

In your Special Dispatch 151, for instance, you translated an interview given by the mufti of Jerusalem to al-Ahram al-Arabi, shortly after the start of the Palestinian uprising.

One question the interviewer asked was: "How do you deal with the Jews who are besieging al-Aqsa and are scattered around it?" Memri translated this as: "How do you feel about the Jews?" - which is a different question. That left you with a reply in Arabic which didn't fit your newly-concocted question. So you cut out the first part of the mufti's reply and combined what was left with part of his answer to another question.

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago
[-] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For sure. I love Wikipedia and hate genocide ♥

[-] kleenbhole@lemy.lol 0 points 1 year ago

Wikipedia isn't without bias, either.

[-] lmaydev@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No but their bias is at least sourced hehe

[-] kleenbhole@lemy.lol -1 points 1 year ago
[-] lmaydev@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] kleenbhole@lemy.lol 2 points 1 year ago

Using sources to justify bias isn't the same thing as referencing the source of your bias.

[-] lmaydev@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

As it's referenced you can look at references for bias.

[-] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Very true, thats why its great to check out primary sources. Note this yahoo article never out right says the translation is from MEMRI. The author listed by yahoo is actually a different newspaper Ukrainska Pravda. They attribute quotes to The Times of Israel, which does actually disclose the source of translation as MEMRI. The author on pravda.UA is listed as editor Iryna Balachukwho very clearly spun the original article. The times of Israel actually shows the headline itself is paraphrasing a tweet by MEMRI. The whole chain of plagiarism is to legitimize propaganda by getting it over to yahoo while hiding the source of the quotes knowing most people wont dig so deeply into it.

If you do happen to dig a little for sources and havent heard of the "Middle East Media Research Institute", the name itself doesnt betray any bias. It is a psy-op and it has been since its inception, which is very easily gleaned by reading the sources in Wikipedia if you havent yet seen their works over the years showcasing the absolute craziest moments in Arab TV.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
126 points (81.5% liked)

World News

39026 readers
1257 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS