556
submitted 2 years ago by TheJims@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] squiblet@kbin.social 118 points 2 years ago

As the article mainly states, this isn't just because Trump can't help it but also as a strategy to make it easier to get a favorable appeal. Plus, it would stoke his favorite way to portray himself, as a victim, and fundraising:

there have been recent conversations among some of Trump’s 2024 campaign brass of how much of an immediate fundraising boost they would enjoy, if a New York judge were to try to put Trump in a cell for even a minute. “All the cash in the world,” one Trump political adviser says.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 99 points 2 years ago

I think the solution here would be for the judge to go after Trump’s lawyers. From the article they’re engaging in some of this behavior themselves, in addition to encouraging it in Trump. But, they want the optics of Trump getting imprisoned in order to play victim and try to help an appeal. Seems the judge could side step that and go after the lawyers instead, who have more to lose.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 60 points 2 years ago

Winner winner chicken dinner!

Lawyers are officers of the court and she can grab them by the short and curlies.

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 21 points 2 years ago

She should remand the entire Trump legal team to the jail for a day, and require Trump to stay at his home for that day as well.

[-] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Can the judge jail the lawyers for repeatedly violating his orders? They should know better than to antagonize the court.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Sure. A judge can hold anyone in contempt of court, and they can fine or jail them for any length of time.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

But could you hold a lawyer in contempt of court for something their client tweeted? That doesn't seem likely.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Yes you can. It's the lawyers job to keep their client in hand not the judges or the courts.

[-] ferralcat 2 points 2 years ago

It seems like putting a lawyer in jail would just be a recipe for delaying a trial though. They can't be expected to provide defense if they're locked up. Or do they just require you to find new counsel?

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I'm sure he has a whole team. If it was a small case, with really only one lawyer, then they would probably not jail them.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

I am far from an expert, but I don't believe so. The court can fine them or maybe recommend them for censure and disbarment.

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Yeah... Trump political advisers seem to be correct all the time...

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
556 points (97.3% liked)

News

36221 readers
351 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS