68

I dream of a program suite like [Overseer+Jacket+Sonaar+Plex] which would search, download and organize a video game library.

Does one already exist?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I'd recommend looking another way, find a source you trust (Fitgirl repacka or something) then Use an RSS feed to download the releases.

I wouldn't recommend auto-installing, and games will also have multiple releases with updates to contend with

[-] YorddleZiggs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If it can be done via RSS, then an *arr tool can be developed. Unfortunately I'm not a coder 😓

I tend to grab releases that seem interesting to me (then buy the full game if I like it), but rarely install all of them. I'm more interested in the organization of the .zip/.iso I have laying in a folder, knowing what I have and what I should snatch.

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It seems like you don't need an arr like tool for your use case. ARRs are designed to download targets that meet criteria, you're looking to download everything.

Instead it sounds like you are looking for a way to browse your downloaded games on a GUI like interface to help you pick which ones to install?

Breaking from if you need or need not an ARR; is your use case a GUI that lists your downloaded games and pulls the cards from IGDB.com?

[-] YorddleZiggs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I guess what I would love are separate features, that are more than likely already done by existing tools/platforms:

  1. a GUI to list locally available content, with clean cards, metadata, community ratings and reviews (like it's done on IGDB.com or HowLongToBeat.com)

  2. a GUI to organise ALL content (locally available and not-locally available) it into custom lists (like it's done on HowLongToBeat.com or Steam)

  3. a GUI to browse gamelists and show availability on configured sources (stores, greystores, torrent, usenet) (like its done in Radarr/Sonarr)

[-] thantik@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

"Fitgirl" bugs the fuck out of me. They repack everything in an executable installer? Fuck that shit. I've been running her 'installer' on a VM, and then ripping the damn NSPs out. Why the fuck won't they just distribute the NSP?

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Compression. You could always just download the original copy/crack.

[-] thantik@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Does compression really matter when it's a torrent and you're just extracting the file anyhow? It's not your bandwidth, it's a conglomeration of everyones bandwidth, so you're not really having to deal with back end things like saving data.

[-] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Long term storage. Size matters.

[-] thantik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Then why not a zip/rar/7z/tar.gz file instead? There's no reason for it to be an executable.

[-] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I don't believe any of the commission methods you listed provide the same amount of compression as the tools used by some repackers.

I'm no expert. I believe UltraArc/FreeArc are what's used to get things down so small, and as far as decompressing goes I don't think support for those compression methods is baked in to your OS/WinRar/7zip etc.

[-] thantik@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Windows supports every single one of those compression methods that I just listed with maybe the exception of tar.gz -- so it's asinine that they package this way. You're just training idiots to pointlessly run .exe files on piracy sites - likely so in the future, when someone wants to - they release a popular game with their packaged EXE and throw everyone into a botnet.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/windows-11-adds-support-for-11-file-archives-including-7-zip-and-rar/

[-] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I think you misunderstood two separate thoughts.

  1. Your listed compression methods are not as high compression as what some repackers use.
  2. The compression algorithm used by some repackers is not supported by OS's or many common archiving software.
[-] thantik@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  1. You're wrong.
  2. Moot point, because of point #1 being wrong.

The compression differences between arc and others are insignificant. On the orders of maybe 10's of megabytes. They are not making custom packagers, etc just to save 10 megabytes on a 7gb ROM.

[-] deur@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You are a fucking dumbass, please just shut the fuck up. Don't download the repacks then, dipshit. The higher compression ratio is valuable for SEEDING, you know, the thing you should be doing with the torrents you consume. It also is nice to have a shorter download.

Also its clear the entire unpacking process is designed to be idiot proof. Hence the exe.

[-] rockhandle@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Not about saving data but I have shitty internet so repacks are a way for me to download stuff without it taking 50 years

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
68 points (92.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54390 readers
374 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS